Yield of bone scintigraphy for the detection of metastatic disease in treatment-naive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Suh, C. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shinagare, A. B. [4 ,5 ]
Westenfield, A. M. [4 ,5 ]
Ramaiya, N. H. [4 ,5 ]
Van den Abbeele, A. D. [4 ,5 ]
Kim, K. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 86 Asanbyeongwon Gil, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Res Inst Radiol, 86 Asanbyeongwon Gil, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[3] Namwon Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 365 Chungjeong Ro, Namwon Si 590702, Jeollabuk Do, South Korea
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Imaging, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; ANTIGEN LEVELS; GLEASON SCORE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; SCAN FINDINGS; TUMOR STAGE; GRADE; NEED; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2017.08.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the yield of staging bone scintigraphy in patients with treatment-naive prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerised search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to find relevant original literature. Studies that investigated the positivity of a staging bone scintigraphy according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or Gleason score in patients with treatment-naive prostate cancer were eligible for inclusion. Metaanalytic pooling was performed using the inverse variance method for calculating weights. RESULTS: Fifty-four eligible studies, which included a total sample size of 20,421 patients, were included. The pooled proportions of the positive bone scintigraphy in patients with PSA <= 10, 10 < PSA <= 20, and PSA > 20 were 3.5% (95% confidence interval [ CI]: 2.405%), 6.9% (95% CI: 4.5e10.3%), and 41.8% (95% CI: 36.3-47.6%). The pooled proportions of the positive bone scintigraphy examinations in patients with Gleason score <= 6, 7, and >= 8were 4.1% (95% CI: 208%), 10% (95% CI: 6.1-15.8%), and 28.7% (95% CI: 21.8-36.8%). Meta-regression analysis revealed that the Gleason score was a significant factor affecting study heterogeneity in patients with PSA <= 10 (p = 0.04). Pooled proportions of positive bone scintigraphy examinations showed 3.4% in patients with a PSA of <= 10 and 3.3% in patients with 10 < PSA <= 20 regarding a Gleason score of <= 7. CONCLUSION: The present results demonstrate a low proportion of positive bone scintigraphy examinations in treatment-naive prostate cancer patients with PSA <= 20 and Gleason score <= 7. The present study may help guide decision support in daily clinical practice regarding the need for bone scintigraphy in this group of patients and might be considered in the design of future clinical guidelines. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bisphosphonates in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and metastatic bone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maria A. Lopez-Olivo
    Nimit A. Shah
    Greg Pratt
    Jan M. Risser
    Elaine Symanski
    Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012, 20 : 2985 - 2998
  • [2] Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naive patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Gusenbauer, Kaela
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Jafri, Ali
    Yu, Hang
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [3] Bisphosphonates in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and metastatic bone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Shah, Nimit A.
    Pratt, Greg
    Risser, Jan M.
    Symanski, Elaine
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (11) : 2985 - 2998
  • [4] The current role of local treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baccaglini, Willy
    Rodrigues, Antonio F.
    Teles, Saulo B.
    Christofe, Nicolle M.
    Glina, Felipe P. A.
    Lemos, Gustavo C.
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Olivares, Ruben
    Carneiro, Arie
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (11) : 1386 - 1393
  • [5] The role of radical prostatectomy for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yi
    Qin, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Yamin
    Chen, Chen
    Wang, Yichun
    Meng, Xianghu
    Song, Ninghong
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2018, 38
  • [6] Prognostic impact of serum testosterone in metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Puche-Sanz, Ignacio
    Chiu, Peter
    Morillo, Ana C.
    Gomez-Gomez, Enrique
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2023, 33 (06) : 472 - 481
  • [7] What is the optimal systemic treatment of men with metastatic, hormone-naive prostate cancer? A STOPCAP systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Vale, C. L.
    Fisher, D. J.
    White, I. R.
    Carpenter, J. R.
    Burdett, S.
    Clarke, N. W.
    Fizazi, K.
    Gravis, G.
    James, N. D.
    Mason, M. D.
    Parmar, M. K. B.
    Rydzewska, L. H.
    Sweeney, C. J.
    Spears, M. R.
    Sydes, M. R.
    Tierney, J. F.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05) : 1249 - 1257
  • [8] Surgical versus medical castration in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Sullivan, N.
    Temperley, H. C.
    Davey, M. G.
    Naughton, A. P.
    Casey, R. G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [9] Surgical versus medical castration in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Sullivan, Niall J.
    Temperley, Hugo C.
    Davey, Matthew G.
    Naughton, Ailish
    Casey, Rowan G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023,
  • [10] Abiraterone for Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhou, Zhi-Rui
    Liu, Shi-Xin
    Zhang, Tian-Song
    Xia, Jun
    Li, Bo
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (03) : 1313 - 1320