Deep seabed mining and communities: A transdisciplinary approach to ecological risk assessment in the South Pacific

被引:1
|
作者
Reichelt-Brushett, Amanda [1 ]
Hewitt, Judi [2 ,3 ]
Kaiser, Stefanie [4 ]
Kim, Rakhyun E. [5 ]
Wood, Ray [6 ]
机构
[1] Southern Cross Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Lismore, NSW, Australia
[2] Natl Inst Water & Atmosphere NIWA, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Lodz, Dept Invertebrate Zool & Hydrobiol, Lodz, Poland
[5] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Chatham Rock Phosphate, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
Ecosystems services; Ecotoxicological tools; Indigenous knowledge; Seabed biodiversity; Social license; MULTIPLE STRESSORS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; BIODIVERSITY; SERVICES; TEMPERATURE; POLLUTANTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4509
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deep-sea mineral extraction is a fledgling industry whose guiding principles, legislation, protocols, and regulations are still evolving. Responsible management of the industry is difficult when it is not clearly understood what biological and environmental diversity or ecosystem services may be at risk. But the industry's infancy provides an opportunity to address this challenge by stakeholder-led development and implementation of a multidisciplinary risk assessment framework. This article aims to present the findings of a workshop held in New Zealand that hosted stakeholders from a broad range of interests and regions in the South Pacific associated with the deep-sea mineral activity. The outputs provide stakeholder-informed ecological risk assessment approaches for deep-sea mining activities, identifying tools and techniques to improve the relevance of risk assessment of deep seabed mining projects to communities in the South Pacific. Discussions highlighted the importance of trust or respect among stakeholders, valuing the "life force" of the ocean, the importance of scientific data, and the complications associated with defining acceptable change. This research highlighted the need for a holistic transdisciplinary approach that connects science, management, industry, and community, an approach most likely to provide a "social license" to operate. There is also a need to revise traditional risk assessment methods to make them more relevant to stakeholders. The development of ecotoxicological tools and approaches is an example of how existing practices could be improved to better support deep-sea mineral management. A case study is provided that highlights the current challenges within the legislative framework of New Zealand. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;00:1-10. (c) 2021 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 673
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Benthic impact experiment: A study of the ecological impacts of deep seabed mining on abyssal benthic communities
    Trueblood, DD
    Ozturgut, E
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH (1997) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL I, 1997, 1997, : 481 - 487
  • [2] Ecological risk assessment for deep-sea mining
    Washburn, Travis W.
    Turner, Phillip J.
    Durden, Jennifer M.
    Jones, Daniel O. B.
    Weaver, Philip
    Van Dover, Cindy L.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 176 : 24 - 39
  • [3] Prohibiting Deep Seabed Mining in the Pacific Ocean: An Ethical Imperative
    Slatter C.
    Development, 2023, 66 (1-2) : 58 - 64
  • [4] Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for deep-sea mining: A Bayesian network for Chatham Rise, Pacific Ocean
    Kaikkonen, Laura
    Clark, Malcolm R.
    Leduc, Daniel
    Nodder, Scott D.
    Rowden, Ashley A.
    Bowden, David A.
    Beaumont, Jennifer
    Cummings, Vonda
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2025, 35 (01)
  • [5] Traditional Dimensions of Seabed Resource Management in the Context of Deep Sea Mining in the Pacific: Learning From the Socio-Ecological Interconnectivity Between Island Communities and the Ocean Realm
    Tilot, Virginie
    Willaert, Klaas
    Guilloux, Bleuenn
    Chen, Wenting
    Mulalap, Clement Y.
    Gaulme, Francois
    Bambridge, Tamatoa
    Peters, Kimberley
    Dahl, Arthur
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [6] Deep seabed mining environment: Preliminary engineering and environmental assessment
    Chung, JS
    Schriever, G
    Sharma, R
    Yamazaki, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH (2001) ISOPE OCEAN MINING SYMPOSIUM, 2001, : 8 - 13
  • [7] The Cook Islands (South Pacific) experience in governance of seabed manganese nodule mining
    Petterson, Michael G.
    Tawake, Akuila
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 167 : 271 - 287
  • [8] RISK ASSESSMENT - CORPORATE VENTURES IN DEEP SEABED MINING OUTSIDE THE FRAMEWORK OF THE UN CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA
    JONES, WB
    OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 1986, 16 (04): : 341 - 351
  • [9] Adaptive Management of Deep-Seabed Mining Projects: A Systems Approach
    Hyman, Jayden
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    Sahin, Oz
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 18 (03) : 674 - 681
  • [10] A geomorphological mapping approach for the assessment of seabed geohazards and risk
    Hough, Gayle
    Green, Jennifer
    Fish, Paul
    Mills, Andy
    Moore, Roger
    MARINE GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 32 (1-2) : 151 - 162