Alignment performance vs. mark quality

被引:0
|
作者
Kirk, JP [1 ]
Yoon, J [1 ]
Wiltshire, T [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Microelect, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 USA
来源
OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XI | 1998年 / 3334卷
关键词
alignment; overlay; testing; relief marks;
D O I
10.1117/12.310777
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A procedure is described for preparing relief alignment marks with precisely degraded quality that are then used to calibrate alignment performance. Alignment degrades with mark quality, eventually failing when the marks are no longer found. Using conventional processes it is difficult to accurately fmd this threshold and virtually impossible to experimentally establish the functional relationship between alignment mark quality and alignment precision. Marks that simulate a full range of process conditions, including planarization and granularity, are formed utilizing the continuous tone relief response of I-line photoresist to lambda = 248nm dose, thereby avoiding the complication of fabricating wafers through selective steps of the actual semiconductor manufacturing process. The usual box in box overlay measurement problem, caused by boxes formed by different processes, is avoided by printing high contrast overlay evaluation structures regardless of the alignment mark quality. Overlay is measured and plotted as a function of mark quality and the lithography engineer knows precisely the condition of the alignment system. For example; It is easily established by direct measurement the alignment system's ability to control magnification as the relief of the alignment marks change.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 501
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MARK VS. BRAND - TERM AND CONTROVERSIES
    Medic, Mane
    Medic, Igor
    Pancic, Mladen
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH V, 2009, 5 : 147 - +
  • [2] Characterization of Robust Alignment Mark to Improve Alignment Performance
    Ahmad, Normah
    Hashim, Uda
    Manaf, Mohd Jeffery
    Ibrahim, Kader
    [J]. IEMT 2006: 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, : 518 - +
  • [3] Knowledge management and performance measurement: quality vs. quantity
    Hasan, Helen
    Crawford, Kathryn
    Warne, Leoni
    Ali, Irena
    [J]. ROLE OF QUALITY IN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2003, : 27 - 41
  • [4] Binocular Collimation vs. Conditional Alignment
    Cook, William J.
    [J]. OPTICAL SYSTEM ALIGNMENT, TOLERANCING, AND VERIFICATION VI, 2012, 8491
  • [5] Quality vs. quantity
    Houck, D
    [J]. WORKFORCE, 2000, 79 (11): : 12 - 12
  • [6] Quality vs. hype
    Li, A
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 1999, 16 (04) : 13 - 13
  • [7] Quality vs. Quantity
    Hoaglund, Margaret
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1950, 50 (03) : 6 - +
  • [8] Poct gasometers quality control:: Manual vs. automatic performance
    Rodríguez, P
    Remón, C
    Peteiro, FJ
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 355 : S390 - S391
  • [9] Attraction vs. Alignment as Drivers of Collective Motion
    Strombom, Daniel
    Tulevech, Grace
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2022, 7
  • [10] Mark vs. Luke: Pleading for the reopening of an old case
    Klinghardt, Matthias
    [J]. NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES, 2006, 52 (04) : 484 - 513