Conventional fluoroscopy-guided versus zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) catheter ablation (CA) for supraventricular tachycardias (SVT). Methods 584 consecutive patients referred to our institution for CA of SVT were analysed. Patients were categorised into two groups; zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) group and conventional fluoroscopy (CF) group. The ZF group was further divided into two subgroups (adults and paediatric). Patient characteristics, procedural information, and follow-up data were compared. Results The ZF group had a higher proportion of paediatric patients (42.2% vs 0.0%; p < 0.001), resulting in a younger age (30.9 +/- 20.3 years vs 52.7 +/- 16.5 years; p < 0.001) and lower BMI (22.8 +/- 5.7 kg/m(2) vs 27.0 +/- 5.4 kg/m(2); p < 0.001). Procedure time was shorter in the ZF group (94.2 +/- 50.4 min vs 104.0 +/- 54.0 min; p = 0.002). There were no major complications and the rate of minor complications did not differ between groups (0.0% vs 0.4%; p = 0.304). Acute procedural success as well as the long-term success rate when only the index procedure was considered did not differ between groups (92.5% vs 95.4%; p = 0.155; 87.1% vs 89.2%; p = 0.422). When repeated procedures were included, the long-term success rate was higher in the ZF group (98.3% vs 93.5%; p = 0.004). The difference can be partially explained by the operators' preferences. Conclusion The safety and efficacy of ZF procedures in adult and paediatric populations are comparable to that of CF procedures.