Regulatory focus and human values

被引:0
|
作者
Keller, Johannes [1 ]
Kesberg, Rebekka [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Dept Social Psychol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
human values; prevention; promotion; regulatory focus; motivation; NEGATIVE ROLE-MODELS; VALUE PRIORITIES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MOTIVATION; PREVENTION; PROMOTION; SELF; PERSONALITY; AVOIDANCE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present article connects two approaches to the study of human motivation and behavior: The Schwartz model of human values and Higgins' regulatory focus theory. Considering a prominent model of human motivation-the Rubicon Model of Action Phases-reveals that although both approaches refer to goals and standards as crucial constructs, human values are specifically relevant concerning the so-called deliberation and evaluation phases whereas self-regulatory orientations are specifically relevant concerning the volitional phases (i.e., planning and action). It may be due to the selective focus on specific aspects of human motivation that up to date hardly any (empirical) work has tried to connect human values and self-regulatory orientations. The reported studies assessed the relation between the endorsement of values proposed in the Schwartz model of human values and individual differences in the two self-regulatory orientations (promotion and prevention) proposed in regulatory focus theory. Findings reveal that prevention-focused self-regulation is positively related to conservation values (security, conformity) and negatively related to values reflecting openness to change (stimulation, self-direction). Moreover, promotion-focused self-regulation was positively related to self-enhancement values (power, achievement) and negatively related to values reflecting self-transcendence (universalism, benevolence). In addition, the observed relations were found using different instruments to measure human values and self-regulatory orientations. In combination, the observed findings support the proposed two-dimensional structure of the value system as well as fundamental assumptions of regulatory focus theory.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 186
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regulatory focus systems and personal values
    Leikas, Sointu
    Lonnqvist, Jan-Erik
    Verkasalo, Markku
    Lindeman, Marjaana
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 39 (03) : 415 - 429
  • [2] The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Endorsement of Material Values
    Lens, Inge
    Pandelaere, Mario
    Shrum, L. J.
    Lee, Jaehoon
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL XXXVII, 2010, 37 : 457 - 458
  • [3] FOCUS ON VALUES
    MCCLURE, LW
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 1991, 79 (02): : 241 - 242
  • [4] Focus on values
    Lozowski, D
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 113 (02) : 55 - 58
  • [5] The Consistency of Personal and Organizational Values When Viewed Through the Lens of Regulatory Focus Theory
    Rich, Lauren
    Baugh, S. Gayle
    Batchelor, John H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2022, 27 (02):
  • [6] Regulatory focus trickle-down: How leader regulatory focus and behavior shape follower regulatory focus
    Johnson, Russell E.
    King, Danielle D.
    Lin, Szu-Han
    Scott, Brent A.
    Walker, Erin M. Jackson
    Wang, Mo
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2017, 140 : 29 - 45
  • [7] Thoughts on using human reliability insights as a focus for regulatory practices
    Ramey-Smith, A
    Wreathall, J
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 1919 - 1922
  • [8] Can we settle regulatory values to protect human health?
    Vindimian, Eric
    [J]. ENVIRONNEMENT RISQUES & SANTE, 2013, 12 (03): : 193 - 195
  • [9] Norm values and psychometric properties for the German health regulatory focus scale – results of a representative survey
    Bjarne Schmalbach
    Markus Zenger
    Elmar Brähler
    Katja Petrowski
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [10] Norm values and psychometric properties for the German health regulatory focus scale - results of a representative survey
    Schmalbach, Bjarne
    Zenger, Markus
    Braehler, Elmar
    Petrowski, Katja
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)