Point-spread function convolution to simulate prestack depth migrated images: A validation study

被引:11
|
作者
Jensen, Kristian [1 ]
Lecomte, Isabelle [1 ]
Gelius, Leiv Jacob [2 ]
Kaschwich, Tina [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Earth Sci, POB 7803, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, POB 1047, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] NORSAR, Gunnar Randers Vei 15, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
关键词
Imaging; Modelling; Rays; Seismics; Wave; SEISMIC DATA; TIME; COMPLEXES; AMPLITUDE; BASIN;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2478.13132
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Seismic migration commonly yields an incomplete reconstruction of the Earth model due to restricted survey aperture, band-limited frequency content and propagation effects. This affects both illumination and resolution of the structures of interest. Through the application of spatial convolution operators commonly referred to as point-spread functions, simulated prestack depth-migrated images incorporating these effects may be obtained. Such simulated images are tailored for analysing distortion effects and enhance our understanding of seismic imaging and subsequent interpretation. Target-oriented point-spread functions may be obtained through a variety of waveform and ray-based approaches. Waveform approaches are generally more robust, but the computational cost involved may be prohibitive. Ray-based approaches, on the other hand, allow for efficient and flexible sensitivity studies at a low computational cost, but inherent limitations may lead to less accuracy. To yield more insight into the similarities and differences between point-spread functions obtained via these two approaches, we first derive analytical expressions of both wave- and ray-based point-spread functions in homogeneous media. By considering single-point scatterers embedded in a uniform velocity field, we demonstrate the conditions under which the derived equations diverge. The accuracy of wave-based and ray-based point-spread functions is further assessed and validated at selected targets in a subsection of the complex BP Statics Benchmark model. We also compare our simulated prestack depth migrated images with the output obtained from an actual prestack depth migration (reverse time migration). Our results reveal that both the wave- and ray-based approaches accurately model illumination, resolution and amplitude effects observed in the reverse time-migrated image. Furthermore, although some minor deviations between the wave-based and ray-based approaches are observed, the overall results indicate that both approaches can be used also for complex models.
引用
收藏
页码:1571 / 1590
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Point-spread function convolution to simulate prestack depthmigrated images: A validation study (vol 69, pg 1571, 2021)
    Jensen, K.
    Lecomte, I
    Gelius, L. J.
    Kaschwich, T.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2022, 70 (08) : 1471 - 1471
  • [2] A Study of the Point-spread Function in SDSS Images
    Xin, Bo
    Ivezic, Zeljko
    Lupton, Robert H.
    Peterson, John R.
    Yoachim, Peter
    Jones, R. Lynne
    Claver, Charles F.
    Angeli, George
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 156 (05):
  • [3] Improvement of transcutaneous fluorescent images with a depth-dependent point-spread function
    Shimizu, K
    Tochio, K
    Kato, Y
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 44 (11) : 2154 - 2161
  • [4] Differencing and Coadding JWST Images with Matched Point-spread Function
    Hu, Lei
    Wang, Lifan
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 167 (05):
  • [5] The telescopic point-spread function
    Racine, R
    [J]. PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 1996, 108 (726) : 699 - 705
  • [6] Increasing the resolution of space images through the reconstruction of point-spread function
    Yakubov, VP
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEAN OPTICS, 1998, 3583 : 264 - 269
  • [7] Efficient Point-spread Function Modeling with ShOpt.jl: A Point-spread Function Benchmarking Study with JWST NIRCam Imaging
    Berman, Edward M.
    McCleary, Jacqueline E.
    Koekemoer, Anton M.
    Franco, Maximilien
    Drakos, Nicole E.
    Liu, Daizhong
    Nightingale, James W.
    Shuntov, Marko
    Scognamiglio, Diana
    Massey, Richard
    Mahler, Guillaume
    McCracken, Henry Joy
    Robertson, Brant E.
    Faisst, Andreas L.
    Casey, Caitlin M.
    Kartaltepe, Jeyhan S.
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 168 (04):
  • [8] THE POINT-SPREAD FUNCTION FOR AIRBORNE RADIOMETRY
    CRAIG, M
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1993, 25 (08): : 1003 - 1013
  • [9] Point-spread function fitting photometry
    Heasley, JN
    [J]. CCD PRECISION PHOTOMETRY WORKSHOP, 1999, 189 : 56 - 73
  • [10] Hydrodynamics of the turbulent point-spread function
    Potvin, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2013, 30 (07) : 1342 - 1349