In vitro activity of tedizolid against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus from Europe and the United States

被引:5
|
作者
Farrell, David J. [1 ,3 ]
Mendes, Rodrigo E. [1 ]
Bensaci, Mekki [2 ]
机构
[1] JMI Labs, 345 Beaver Kreek Ctr, North Liberty, IA USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
[3] Saskatchewan Dis Control Lab, 5 Res Dr, Regina, SK S4S 0A4, Canada
关键词
Gram-positive; Coagulase-negative staphylococci; Oxazolidinone; Susceptibility; COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI; GRAM-POSITIVE PATHOGENS; ACUTE BACTERIAL SKIN; LINEZOLID RESISTANCE; STRUCTURE INFECTIONS; PHOSPHATE TR-701; SUSCEPTIBILITY; EMERGENCE; SURVEILLANCE; OXAZOLIDINONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.08.006
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus are unique among CoNS in that the former often causes aggressive disease, while the latter consistently exhibits high rates of multidrug resistance. We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of contemporary (2012-2013) isolates from both pathogens to tedizolid and comparators, using standard methodology. Results were interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Overall, 106 S. lugdunensis and 103 S. haemolyticus isolates were collected from 51 medical centers in the United States and 30 centers in 18 European countries. Tedizolid showed good activity against S. lugdunensis (MIC50/MIC90 : 0.12/0.12 mg/L) and S. haemolyticus (MIC50/MIC90: 0.12/0.12 mg/L), inhibiting all isolates at MIC <= 0.25 mg/L Based on the EUCAST breakpoint for staphylococci and when substituting the CLSI breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus, all isolates were tedizolid susceptible. All isolates were also susceptible to linezolid, but the in vitro potency of tedizolid was 4-fold greater than that of linezolid against both S. lugdunensis and S. haemolyticus, based on MIC 90 values. S. lugdunensis exhibited ?..99% susceptibility to vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin, levofioxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 7% of isolates were resistant to tetracycline, 11% to clindamycin, and 2% were methicillin-resistant. S. haemolyticus exhibited high rates of resistance to commonly used anti-staphylococcal agents: 71% of isolates were resistant to methicillin, 36%-37% to clindamycin, and 30%-50% to gentamicin. These in vitro findings suggest that tedizolid could be an alternative treatment option for infections due to these medically important CoNS pathogens. Additional clinical evaluation and continued surveillance of tedizolid in vitro activity against S. lugdunensis and S. haemolyticus are warranted. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 88
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro activity of ivermectin against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Shoaib Ashraf
    Umer Chaudhry
    Ali Raza
    Debasri Ghosh
    Xin Zhao
    Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 7
  • [2] In vitro activity of ivermectin against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Ashraf, Shoaib
    Chaudhry, Umer
    Raza, Ali
    Ghosh, Debasri
    Zhao, Xin
    ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2018, 7
  • [3] Linezolid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus haemolyticus
    Calvo, J.
    Cano, M.
    Marin, M.
    Cercenado, E.
    Martinez-Martinez, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S230 - S230
  • [4] Investigation of Plasmids Among Clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Isolates From Egypt
    Mores, Carine R.
    Montelongo, Cesar
    Putonti, Catherine
    Wolfe, Alan J.
    Abouelfetouh, Alaa
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [5] In vitro activity of Exebacase (CF-301) against clinical Staphylococcus aureus surveillance isolates from the United States, Europe, and Latin America, 2015-2017
    Traczewski, Maria
    Oh, Jun
    Cassino, Cara
    Schuch, Raymond
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 95 (04)
  • [6] Activity of linezolid and tedizolid against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant and methicillin and linezolid resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro comparison
    Penuelas, Marina
    Javier Candel, Francisco
    Lejarraga, Clara
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Laura
    Manuel Vinuela-Prieto, Jose
    Lopez de Mendoza, Diego
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2016, 29 (05) : 255 - 258
  • [7] Whole-Genome Sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Clinical Isolates from Egypt
    Montelongo, Cesar
    Mores, Carine R.
    Putonti, Catherine
    Wolfe, Alan J.
    Abouelfetouh, Alaa
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [8] Clinical Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates: phenotypic and genotypic diversity
    Layer, F.
    Pasemann, B.
    Ghebremedhin, B.
    Moder, K. A.
    Witte, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 299 : 40 - 40
  • [9] RAPD TYPING OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-HAEMOLYTICUS
    YOUNG, KA
    POWER, EGM
    DRYDEN, RS
    PHILLIPS, I
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 18 (02) : 86 - 89
  • [10] In Vitro Activities Against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus
    Koteli, A.
    Kakoulidou, A.
    Tsingene, S.
    Andronoglou, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 12 : E272 - E272