Cost effectiveness of itraconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections

被引:12
|
作者
de Vries, Robin [1 ]
Daenen, Simon [2 ]
Tolley, Keith [3 ]
Glasmacher, Axel [4 ]
Prentice, Archie [5 ]
Howells, Sarah [3 ]
Christopherson, Hariette [3 ]
de Jong-van den Berg, Lolkje T. W. [1 ]
Postma, Maarten J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, GRIP, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Ortho Biotech, High Wycombe, Bucks, England
[4] Univ Hosp Bonn, Bonn, Germany
[5] Derriford Hosp, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200826010-00007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients treated for haematological malignancies are associated with a high mortality rate and, therefore, require early treatment. As the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections is difficult, effective antifungal prophylaxis is desirable. So far, fluconazole has been the most commonly used. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of itraconazole compared with both fluconazole and no prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections in haematological patients, mean age 51 years, in Germany and The Netherlands. Study design: We designed a probabilistic decision model to fully incorporate the uncertainty associated with the risk estimates of acquiring an invasive fungal infection. These risk estimates were extracted from two meta-analyses, evaluating the effectiveness of fluconazole and itraconazole and no prophylaxis. The perspective of the analysis was that of the healthcare sector; only medical costs were taken into account. All costs were reported in (sic), year 2004 values. Cost effectiveness was expressed as net costs per invasive fungal infection averted. No discounting was performed, as the model followed patients during their neutropenic period, which was assumed to be less than 1 year. Results: According to our probabilistic decision model, the monetary benefits of averted healthcare exceed the costs of itraconazole prophylaxis under baseline assumptions (95% Cl: from cost-saving to (sic)5000 per invasive fungal infection averted). Compared with fluconazole, itraconazole is estimated to be both more effective and more economically favourable, with a probability of almost 98%. Conclusions: In specific groups of neutropenic patients treated for haematological malignancies, itraconazole prophylaxis could potentially reduce overall healthcare expenditure, without harming effectiveness, in settings where fluconazole is common practice in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 90
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Effectiveness of Itraconazole in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections
    Robin de Vries
    Simon Daenen
    Keith Tolley
    Axel Glasmacher
    Archie Prentice
    Sarah Howells
    Hariette Christopherson
    Lolkje T. W. de Jong-van den Berg
    Maarten J. Postma
    PharmacoEconomics, 2008, 26 : 75 - 90
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of Itraconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections for neutropenic patients; A study for 3 European countries.
    Postma, MJ
    de Vries, R
    Christopherson, H
    Howells, S
    Tolley, K
    Daenen, S
    Glasmacher, A
    Prentice, A
    Christie, A
    BLOOD, 2005, 106 (11) : 876A - 876A
  • [3] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE OR ITRACONAZOLE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS AMONG NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS IN THAILAND
    Junjarunee, S.
    Numuang, K.
    Lerdlitruangsin, S.
    Itzler, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A806 - A806
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN THE FRENCH SETTING
    Lafuma, A. L.
    Michallet, M.
    Herbrecht, R.
    Ribaud, P.
    Dupont, J. P.
    Gangneux, J. P.
    Moreau, P.
    Berger, P.
    O'Sullivan, A. K.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 93 : 321 - 322
  • [5] Breakthrough invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients after prophylaxis with itraconazole
    Glasmacher, A
    Hahn, C
    Leutner, C
    Molitor, E
    Wardelmann, E
    Losem, C
    Sauerbruch, T
    Marklein, G
    Schmidt-Wolf, IGH
    MYCOSES, 1999, 42 (7-8) : 443 - 451
  • [6] Cost Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole/Itraconazole in Prophylactic Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Mexico
    Rely, Kely
    Alexandre, Pierre K.
    Salinas Escudero, Guillermo
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : S39 - S42
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE COMPARED TO FLUCONAZOLE/ITRACONAZOLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    Athanasakis, K.
    Petrakis, I
    Kyriopoulos, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A393 - A393
  • [8] PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ITRACONAZOLE ORAL SOLUTION IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN TURKEY
    Kanbur, B.
    Azap, A.
    Arat, M.
    Sarioz, F.
    Tatar, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A352 - A352
  • [9] A PROBABILISTIC COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODEL FOR PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH NEUTROPENIA IN SPAIN
    Darba, J.
    Restovic, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A429 - A429
  • [10] PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PARENTERAL ITRACONAZOLE USE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN TURKISH SETTING
    Kanbur, B.
    Sarioz, F.
    Tatar, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A434 - A434