Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report

被引:76
|
作者
Chanques, Gerald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pohlman, Anne [1 ]
Kress, John P. [1 ]
Molinari, Nicolas [4 ]
de Jong, Audrey [4 ]
Jaber, Samir [2 ,3 ]
Hall, Jesse B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sect Pulm & Crit Care, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Montpellier, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care Med, St Eloi Hosp, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier 2, Univ Montpellier 1, INSERM, Unite U1046, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[4] Univ Montpellier Hosp, Dept Stat, F-34295 Montpellier, France
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2014年 / 18卷 / 05期
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; AGITATION-SEDATION SCALE; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; OBSERVATION TOOL; ADULT PATIENTS; CAM-ICU; DELIRIUM; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/cc14000
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pain assessment is associated with important outcomes in ICU patients but remains challenging, particularly in non-communicative patients. Use of a reliable tool is paramount to allow any implementation of sedation/analgesia protocols in a multidisciplinary team. This study compared psychometric properties (inter-rater agreement primarily; validity, responsiveness and feasibility secondarily) of three pain scales: Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS/BPS-NI, that is BPS for Non-Intubated patients), Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Non-verbal Pain Scale (NVPS), the pain tool routinely used in this 16-bed medical ICU. Methods: Pain was assessed by at least one of four investigators and one of the 20 bedside nurses before, during and 10 minutes after routine care procedures in non-comatose patients (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale >= - 3) who were unable to self-report their pain intensity. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU was used to assess delirium. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data are presented as median (25(th) to 75(th)). Results: A total of 258 paired assessments of pain were performed in 30 patients (43% lightly sedated, 57% with delirium, 63% mechanically ventilated). All three scales demonstrated good psychometric properties. However, BPS and CPOT exhibited the best inter-rater reliability (weighted-kappa 0.81 for BPS and CPOT) and the best internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha 0.80 for BPS, 0.81 for CPOT), which were higher than for NVPS (weighted-kappa 0.71, P <0.05; Cronbach-alpha 0.76, P <0.01). Responsiveness was significantly higher for BPS compared to CPOT and for CPOT compared to NVPS. For feasibility, BPS was rated as the easiest scale to remember but there was no significant difference in regards to users' preference. Conclusions: BPS and CPOT demonstrate similar psychometric properties in non-communicative intubated and non-intubated ICU patients.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report
    Gerald Chanques
    Anne Pohlman
    John P Kress
    Nicolas Molinari
    Audrey de Jong
    Samir Jaber
    Jesse B Hall
    [J]. Critical Care, 18
  • [2] Psychometric comparison of three behavioral scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report
    G Papakitsos
    A Kapsali
    T Papakitsou
    [J]. Critical Care, 19 (Suppl 1):
  • [3] Appropriateness of behavioural scales in the monitoring of pain in the critically ill patient unable to self-report
    Robleda-Font, G.
    Lopez-Lopez, C.
    Latorre-Marco, I.
    Pozas-Pena, J.
    Alonso-Crespo, D.
    Valles-Fructuoso, O.
    Castanera-Duro, Y. A.
    [J]. ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2024, 35 (02): : e17 - e22
  • [4] Pain Assessment of the Critically Ill Patient Unable to Self-report
    Mansilla, Grace
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2014, 63 (02) : E88 - E89
  • [5] Pain descriptors for critically ill patients unable to self-report
    Haslam, Lynn
    Dale, Craig
    Knechtel, Leasa
    Rose, Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2012, 68 (05) : 1082 - 1089
  • [6] SURVEY OF PAIN ASSESSMENT PRACTICES FOR CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS UNABLE TO SELF-REPORT PAIN
    Rose, L.
    Haslam, L.
    Dale, C.
    Knechtel, L.
    Fraser, M.
    Mcgillion, M.
    Watt-Watson, J.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 116 - 116
  • [7] Assessing Pain in Critically Ill Patients Who Are Unable to Self-Report
    Pasola, Emily
    Posa, Patricia
    Harrison, Denise
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2014, 34 (02) : E29 - E30
  • [8] BEHAVIORAL PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS UNABLE TO SELF-REPORT PAIN
    Rose, Louise
    Haslam, Lynn
    Dale, Craig
    Knechtel, Leasa
    McGillion, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 22 (03) : 246 - 255
  • [9] Postoperative pain assessment in hospital patients who are unable to self-report pain
    Boerlage, A. A.
    Cheuk-Alam-Balrak, J. M.
    Tibboel, D.
    van Dijk, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 : 22 - 22
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF THREE SELF-REPORT PAIN SCALES IN ADULTS WITH ACUTE PAIN
    Bahreini, Maryam
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (01): : 10 - 18