Experimental Study of Horizontal Bubble Plume With Computational Fluid Dynamics Benchmarking

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Shao-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Macke, Christopher [1 ]
Hibiki, Takashi [1 ]
Ishii, Mamoru [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Ju, Peng [1 ]
Sharma, Subash [1 ]
Kondo, Yoshiyuki [4 ]
Kawamizu, Tsutomu [5 ]
Yoshimoto, Takashi [5 ]
Kagawa, Seiji [5 ]
Tanimoto, Koichi [4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Nucl Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Nucl Engn & Sci, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
[3] Virginia Tech, Nucl Engn Program, Dept Mech Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Takasago Res & Dev Ctr, 2-1-1 Shinhama Arai Cho, Takasago, Hyogo 6768686, Japan
[5] Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Hiroshima Res & Dev Ctr, Nishi Ku, Kan On Shin Machi4 Chome, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7338553, Japan
关键词
bubble plume; CFD; void fraction; two-phase flow; INJECTION; VELOCITY; WATER; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4033560
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In order to study the two-phase flow behaviors of a horizontal bubble plume in a tank, experimental tests along with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out in this paper. An experimental facility was designed and constructed which allows air-water bubble jet being injected horizontally into a water tank by three-parallel injector nozzles with different gas and liquid superficial velocities (hjgiin = 2.7-5.7 m/s and hjfiin = 1.8-3.4 m/s). Two sizes of injector nozzles (D = 0.053m and 0.035 m) were tested to examine the injector size effect. Important parameters including void fraction, fluid velocity, bubble Sauter mean diameter, and their distributions in the tank were measured and analyzed. In addition to the experimental work, selected flow conditions were simulated with ANSYS CFX 13.0. Compared with the experimental data, the present CFD simulation can predict the general trends of void and flow distributions and the recirculation fluid velocity with an accuracy of 630%. The present CFD simulation methodology has been validated by the experimental results and can be applied to bubble plume analyses and design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking for Practical Training in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Teresa Parra-Santos, M.
    Castro, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF CASES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 17 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] Two-phase computational fluid dynamics assessment of bubble plume in air-diffuser destratification
    Yum, K
    Ahn, J
    Park, H
    Ko, IH
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 26 (09) : 1043 - 1054
  • [3] Annular Gap Bubble Column: Experimental Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling
    Besagni, Giorgio
    Guedon, Gael Raymond
    Inzoli, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (01):
  • [4] Discussion on two plume formulae with computational fluid dynamics
    Chow, WK
    Yin, R
    JOURNAL OF FIRE SCIENCES, 2002, 20 (03) : 179 - 201
  • [5] Air ingress benchmarking with computational fluid dynamics analysis
    Kadak, AC
    Zhai, TL
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2006, 236 (5-6) : 587 - 602
  • [6] Experimental studies of swarm robotic chemical plume tracing using computational fluid dynamics simulations
    Zarzhitsky, Dimitri V.
    Spears, Diana F.
    Thayer, David R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2010, 3 (04) : 631 - 671
  • [7] Stability and convergence of computational eulerian two-fluid model for a bubble plume
    Vaidheeswaran, Avinash
    de Bertodano, Martin Lopez
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2017, 160 : 210 - 226
  • [8] Density destratification by a single bubble plume in long horizontal fluid layers and in a dam lake
    Murai, Yuichi
    Tasaka, Yuji
    Noto, Daisuke
    Ulloa, Hugo
    ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [9] Computational Study of the Dynamics of the Taylor Bubble
    Sharaborin, Evgenii L.
    Rogozin, Oleg A.
    Kasimov, Aslan R.
    FLUIDS, 2021, 6 (11)
  • [10] A joint computational fluid dynamics and experimental fluid dynamics program
    Tyler, C
    ICIASF'03 RECORD: 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INSTRUMENTATION IN AEROSPACE SIMULATION FACILITIES, 2003, : 202 - 213