Postverbal negation Typology, diachrony, areality

The paper sketches the state of affairs of our understanding of postverbal negation. It departs from the typological finding that there is a crosslinguistic preference for a negator to precede the verb. Nevertheless, a sizable proportion of the world's languages adhere to a pattern with a negator following the verb, and such negators are typically morphologically bound. The existence of this pattern, unfavorable from a functional perspective, calls for a diachronic explanation. The paper takes stock of diachronic processes that can lead to postverbal negation, in general, and suffixal negation, in particular. Furthermore, a language may acquire a pattern with postverbal negation through language contact, and this is yet another perspective that the paper addresses. Finally, we introduce the contributions to this volume, highlighting the new insights.