Assuring the quality of online learning in higher education: Adaptations in design and implementation

被引:3
|
作者
Konstantinidou, Athina [1 ]
Nisiforou, Efi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nicosia, Dept Educ, Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
distance education; online learning; learning design principles; quality of online courses; mixed-method research; DISTANCE HIGHER-EDUCATION; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; SATISFACTION; SYSTEMS; COURSES; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; DELIVERY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.14742/ajet.7910
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In higher education, designing online courses aligned with students' preferences impacts learning effectiveness. Our research aimed to investigate which learning design elements can affect the quality of online learning. To achieve this, we followed a systematic literature review, identified current trends and conducted an online survey outlining university students' opinions. The results revealed that students' preferences agree with universal learning design principles, acting as course quality determinants. These elements relate to the structure, appearance, content, interactivity of the course and support in the online setting. We recommend that courses are well organised and include authentic resources, activities and assessments, divided consistently into smaller, topic based chunks that resemble experiences drawn from real life. The objectives need to be communicated while the expected behaviours are known to students. The respective workload must be equally distributed across the course spectrum in an environment that balances collaborative and self-paced learning. Students must be familiar with the technology, which is also an easy-to-access gate. Lastly, it is suggested that technical and pedagogical support is constantly present so that participants efficiently work in the online context. Implications for practice or policy: In collaboration with educators, instructional designers can use the quality indicators that emerged through the study when designing and evaluating higher education courses. Instructional designers and educators may prioritise learners' autonomy, aligning course requirements with students' sense of control. Instructional designers and educators can distribute students' workload equally throughout the course, without strict deadlines, to improve the learning experience. Educators may promote collaborative assignments but moderately balance them with an individual-based assessment mode.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The practice of quality in assuring learning in higher education
    French, Erica
    Summers, Jane
    Kinash, Shelley
    Lawson, Romy
    Taylor, Tracy
    Herbert, James
    Fallshaw, Eveline
    Hall, Cathy
    QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 20 (01) : 24 - 43
  • [2] ONLINE LEARNING RESOURCES ENSURING THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    Vodenko, Konstantin V.
    Latsveeva, Alexandra V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (03) : 939 - 950
  • [3] Universal Design for Learning Infusion in Online Higher Education
    Altowairiki, Noha F.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2023, 27 (01): : 296 - 312
  • [6] Quality Indicators and Models for Online Learning Quality Assurance in Higher Education
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Naureen, Shazia
    Sultan, Sohaib
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2022, 20 (04): : 374 - 385
  • [7] Quality Assessment of Online Learning in Regional Higher Education Systems
    Gritsova, Olga A.
    Tissen, Elena, V
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2021, 17 (03): : 929 - 943
  • [8] ASSURING QUALITY IN E-LEARNING: IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF QUALITY COURSE DESIGN STANDARDS IN ONLINE PROGRAMS
    Vlachopoulos, Dimitrios
    EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 6234 - 6241
  • [9] Assuring quality education and learning: Lessons from Education for All
    Benavot A.
    PROSPECTS, 2016, 46 (1) : 5 - 14
  • [10] Assuring quality in transnational higher education: a matter of collaboration or control?
    Smith, Karen
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (07) : 793 - 806