On the validity of quasilinear theory applied to the electron bump-on-tail instability

被引:0
|
作者
Crews, D. W. [1 ]
Shumlak, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Aerosp & Energet Res Program, Computat Plasma Dynam Lab, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHOD; PLASMA; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1063/5.0086442
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The accuracy of quasilinear theory applied to the electron bump-on-tail instability, a classic model problem, is explored with conservative high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods applied to both the quasilinear equations and to a direct simulation of the Vlasov-Poisson equations. The initial condition is chosen in the regime of beam parameters for which quasilinear theory should be applicable. Quasilinear diffusion is initially in good agreement with the direct simulation but later underestimates the turbulent momentum flux. The greater turbulent flux of the direct simulation leads to a correction from quasilinear evolution by quenching the instability in a finite time. Flux enhancement above quasilinear levels occurs as the phase space eddy turnover time in the largest amplitude wavepackets becomes comparable to the transit time of resonant phase fluid through wavepacket potentials. In this regime, eddies effectively turn over during wavepacket transit so that phase fluid predominantly disperses by eddy phase mixing rather than by randomly phased waves. The enhanced turbulent flux of resonant phase fluid leads, in turn, through energy conservation to an increase in non-resonant turbulent flux and, thus, to an enhanced heating of the main thermal body above quasilinear predictions. These findings shed light on the kinetic turbulence fluctuation spectrum and support the theory that collisionless momentum diffusion beyond the quasilinear approximation can be understood through the dynamics of phase space eddies (or clumps and granulations). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparisons of the nonlinear and the quasilinear model for the bump-on-tail instability with phase decorrelation
    Tholerus, S.
    Hellsten, T.
    Johnson, T.
    [J]. JOINT VARENNA-LAUSANNE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP 2014, 2014, 561
  • [2] QUASILINEAR THEORY OF SHEAR ALFVEN WAVES DRIVEN BY A BUMP-ON-TAIL DISTRIBUTION
    MIGLIUOLO, S
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1980, 23 (03) : 573 - 576
  • [3] Quasilinear approach to bump-on-tail instability using non-Maxwellian distributions
    Sheikh, A.
    Zaheer, S.
    Noreen, N.
    Shah, H. A.
    [J]. PROGRESS OF THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS, 2023, 2023 (02):
  • [4] Bump-on-tail instability in space plasmas
    Sarkar, Susmita
    Paul, Samit
    Denra, Raicharan
    [J]. PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2015, 22 (10)
  • [5] BGK states from the bump-on-tail instability
    Balmforth, N. J.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2012, 17 (05) : 1989 - 1997
  • [6] Bump-on-Tail Instability in Cairns Distributed Plasma
    Rui, Huo
    Hong, Wang
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 54 (04)
  • [7] Exploration on the Possible Bump-on-Tail Instability in VASIMR
    Jing, Dong
    Chang, Lei
    Yang, Xin
    Xia, Ying
    Zhang, Jin-Heng
    Zhou, Hai -Shan
    Luo, Guang-Nan
    [J]. SPACE: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 4
  • [8] Evolution of the bump-on-tail instability in compressing plasma
    Schmit, P. F.
    Mooney, C. R.
    Dodin, I. Y.
    Fisch, N. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS, 2011, 77 : 629 - 638
  • [9] Spectral dynamics of spatially incoherent bump-on-tail instability
    Dylov, Dmitry V.
    Fleischer, Jason W.
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2009, 34 (17) : 2673 - 2675
  • [10] Observation of all-optical bump-on-tail instability
    Dylov, Dmitry V.
    Fleischer, Jason W.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2008, 100 (10)