Background: Over the last two decades, pharmaceutical intervention for the treatment of type 2 diabetes has expanded. Studies over this same time demonstrated the benefits of tight glycemic control. Unfortunately, despite the availability of novel therapies, glycemic control remains problematic. Nonpharmacologic interventions need to be explored, including patient empowerment. Improving patient knowledge of diabetes may ultimately improve glycemic control. To test this hypothesis, we compared patients' diabetes knowledge with their glycemic control. Methods: The Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test, designed by the University of Michigan, was administered to patients with type 2 diabetes at three University of New Mexico primary care clinics. Patient records were reviewed. The most recent hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) value was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. Results: Seventy-seven patients completed surveys and had HbA(1c) values available. Only questions 1 to 14 of the 23-question survey were used because they pertained specifically to type 2 diabetes. HbA(1c) was inversely correlated with the number of questions answered correctly on the test (r=-.337, p<.003). Using "all subsets" regression, a correct response to questions 1, 3, and 9 specifically correlated with a lower HbA(1c) (p<.0001). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that an inverse linear relationship exists between performance on this diabetes test and HbA(1c) values. Improvement in patient knowledge of diabetes and the importance of treatment may indeed improve glycemic control and ultimately decrease complications. Studies aimed at empowering patients with disease knowledge may help control the ramifications of the growing diabetes epidemic.
