Topology optimization with accessibility constraint for multi-axis machining

被引:38
|
作者
Mirzendehdel, Amir M. [1 ]
Behandish, Morad [1 ]
Nelaturi, Saigopal [1 ]
机构
[1] Palo Alto Res Ctr, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
Design for manufacturing; Topology optimization; Accessibility analysis; Multi-axis machining; Configuration space; Hybrid manufacturing; GEOMETRY PROJECTION METHOD; MANUFACTURING PROCESSES; ORIENTATIONS; DESIGN; CODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2020.102825
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present a topology optimization (TO) framework to enable automated design of mechanical components while ensuring the result can be manufactured using multi-axis machining. Although TO improves the part's performance, the as-designed model is often geometrically too complex to be machined and the as-manufactured model can significantly vary due to machining constraints that are not accounted for during TO. In other words, many of the optimized design features cannot be accessed by a machine tool without colliding with the part (or fixtures). The subsequent post-processing to make the part machinable with the given setup requires trial-and-error without guarantees on preserving the optimized performance. Our proposed approach is based on the well-established accessibility analysis formulation using convolutions in configuration space that is extensively used in spatial planning and robotics. We define an inaccessibility measure field (IMF) over the design domain to identify non-manufacturable features and quantify their contribution to non-manufacturability. The IMF is used to penalize the sensitivity field of performance objectives and constraints to prevent formation of inaccessible regions. Unlike existing discrete formulations, our IMF provides a continuous spatial field that is desirable for TO convergence. Our approach applies to arbitrary geometric complexity of the part, tools, and fixtures, and is highly parallelizable on multicore architecture. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on benchmark and realistic examples in 2D and 3D. We also show that it is possible to directly construct manufacturing plans for the optimized designs based on the accessibility information. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Topology optimization for multi-axis machining
    Langelaar, Matthijs
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 351 : 226 - 252
  • [2] Deep learning-based topology optimization for multi-axis machining
    Guo, Yifan
    Liu, Jikai
    Ma, Yongsheng
    Ahmad, Rafiq
    [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2025, 138
  • [3] A Novel Mathematical Formulation for Density-Based Topology Optimization Method Considering Multi-Axis Machining Constraint
    Deng, Hao
    To, Albert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2022, 144 (06)
  • [4] Topology optimization considering multi-axis machining constraints using projection methods
    Lee, Hak Yong
    Zhu, Mu
    Guest, James K.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 390
  • [5] Geometric parameter optimization in multi-axis machining
    Ye, Tao
    Xiong, Cai-Hua
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2008, 40 (08) : 879 - 890
  • [6] Multi-axis machining
    Anon
    [J]. Modern Machine Shop, 2002, 74 (08)
  • [7] CAD-integrated topology optimization method with dynamic extrusion feature evolution for multi-axis machining
    Deng, Hao
    Vulimiri, Praveen S.
    To, Albert C.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 390
  • [8] Study on Tool Path Optimization in Multi-axis NC Machining
    Niu, Xinghua
    Wang, Tianding
    Shen, Bofei
    Zhao, Tiemin
    Huang, Qianyou
    [J]. 2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (ICMME 2015), 2015, 34
  • [9] Creating a Multi-axis Machining Postprocessor
    Vavruska, Petr
    [J]. ACTA POLYTECHNICA, 2012, 52 (04) : 113 - 117
  • [10] Pushing the Boundaries of Multi-Axis Machining
    不详
    [J]. MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2023, 171 (04): : 24 - 26