Regional renewable energy development in China: A multidimensional assessment

被引:132
|
作者
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Dayong [1 ]
Ji, Qiang [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Xunpeng [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Australia China Relat Inst, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] Hubei Univ Econ, Ctr Hubei Cooperat Innovat Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Low Carbon Econ, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; Dynamic principal component analysis; Multidimensional index; Renewable energy development; CO2; EMISSIONS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CONSUMPTION; INVESTMENT; DETERMINANTS; EFFICIENCY; POLICIES; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.109797
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable energy (RE) is strategically important to achieve sustainability. Its development in China, however, is clearly imbalanced across regions. The uneven distribution of natural resources, financial resources and other factors across this country has brought serious challenges to the policymakers. It is thus important to give a comprehensive evaluation of China's regional RE development. To do so, this paper introduces a multidimensional approach and establishes a quantitative evaluation framework. Based on the existing literature, five dimensions of factors have been chosen for the framwork: economic foundation, institutions, technological development potential, energy security and environmental protection, and current status of the RE sector. A dynamic principal component analysis technique is applied to data from 29 provinces between 2008 and 2014. The results demonstrate large variations in RE development across provinces in China. More economically developed regions, such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong, have maintained a higher ranking and have clear advantages in almost all dimensions. Policy implications and recommendations for more balanced development across China are drawn from the empirical results. This approach can also be extended to investigate similar issues in other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional sustainable and renewable energy development in China: A comprehensive assessment and influencing factors
    Zheng, Jiansong
    Chen, Ziyi
    Zhang, Tao
    Huang, Xiuquan
    Wang, Xi
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 76 - 80
  • [2] The impact of regional renewable energy development on environmental sustainability in China
    Lee, Chi-Chuan
    Zhang, Jian
    Hou, Shanshuai
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 80
  • [3] China's regional assessment of renewable energy vulnerability to climate change
    Wang, Bing
    Ke, Ruo-Yu
    Yuan, Xiao-Chen
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 : 185 - 195
  • [4] A Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of China's Renewable Energy Development and Regional Energy Development
    Liu, Wei
    Fan, Wenyu
    Hong, Yu
    Chen, Chanting
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [5] A Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of China’s Renewable Energy Development and Regional Energy Development
    Liu, Wei
    Fan, Wenyu
    Hong, Yu
    Chen, Chanting
    [J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021, 9
  • [6] A comprehensive evaluation of the development and utilization of China's regional renewable energy
    Yu, Shiwei
    Zheng, Yali
    Li, Longxi
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 127 : 73 - 86
  • [7] Development of China renewable energy
    Zhou, FQ
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1996, 9 (1-4) : 1132 - 1137
  • [8] China's renewable energy development
    Wang, Zhongying
    Li, Junfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 (01) : 50 - 61
  • [9] Renewable Energy Development in East China
    Chen G.C.
    [J]. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2017, 4 (2): : 33 - 37