Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve - What should we expect?

被引:44
|
作者
Misra, M
Schiff, J
Rendon, G
Rothschild, J
Schwaitzberg, S
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Paul Pierce Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; intraoperative cholangiography; endoscopic retrograde cholanglopancreatography; common bile duct;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-004-8919-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the late 1980s was accompanied an increase,in common bile duct (CBD) injuries. This retrospective analysis of 2,005 cholecystectomies performed at a single institution investigates the factors that have,contributed to a record of zero CBD injuries in 1,674 consecutive LC. Methods: The medical records of 1,285 consecutive patients operated on from 7 July 1996 to 6 June 2003 were obtained. We also examined the peer review records of an additional 720 LC performed between I January 1990 and 7 July 1996. Results: There were no CBD injuries among 1,674 consecutive LC patients spanning the period since 1990. Of the 954 patients who underwent LC since 1996, six had a cystic duct leak and five had a duct of Luschka leak. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was performed in 20.2% of cases (n = 193/954). Seventy of 157 patients who underwent cholangiography alone demonstrated one or more stones in the CBD (44.6%). In 40 patients (58.0%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) was uniformly successful in clearing intraoperatively identified stones. In 36.2% of,cases, the stones were removed via laparoscopic CBD exploration (CBDE) (n = 25). In 5.8% of positive cases, the stones were removed via open CBDE (n = 4). Among 761 patients who did not undergo IOC, seven patients (0.92%) returned to the hospital for retained stones. Three of these patients had elevated liver function tests (LIFT) preoperatively (1.3%) and four had normal LIFT (1.1%). Conclusions: Injuries of the CBD can be avoided by performing an extensive dissection of the triangle of Calot and by developing a critical view of the operative field to ensure the patient's safety during LC. If all LFT are normal and IOC is not performed, the occurrence of clinically significant stones postoperatively is minimal; in this group, only four patients had retained stones. Thus, in the face of,normal LIFT, routine IOC is unnecessary for a low CBD injury rate, and a return to the hospital,for retained bile duct stones is rarely, required, regardless of the number of times ductal stones are found on routine cholangiography.. This implies that the significance of the stones discovered at IOC is questionable in most cases, thereby Providing an argument against routine cholangiography. Most discovered CBD Stones can be treated by ERCP, thus obviating the need for the T-tube drainage associated with CBDE. The 21st century finds LC to be a mature and safe surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1271
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect?
    M. Misra
    J. Schiff
    G. Rendon
    J. Rothschild
    S. Schwaitzberg
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 1266 - 1271
  • [2] What Should We Expect After the Next Attack?
    Silver, Roxane Cohen
    Fischhoff, Baruch
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 66 (06) : 567 - 572
  • [3] Ongoing trials: What should we expect after ALLHAT?
    Ji-Guang Wang
    Jan A. Staessen
    Anthony M. Heagerty
    [J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2003, 5 : 340 - 345
  • [4] The learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Hunter, JG
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, 6 (01): : 24 - 25
  • [5] Ongoing trials: What should we expect after ALLHAT?
    Wang, JG
    Staessen, JA
    Heagerty, AM
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2003, 5 (04) : 340 - 345
  • [6] The Guidelines: What should we expect?
    Fernandez, H.
    Marret, H.
    Fritel, X.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2012, 41 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [7] TVT SECUR. WHAT TO EXPECT AFTER THE LEARNING CURVE
    Assassa, R.
    Girn, Z.
    Marsh, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S223 - S224
  • [8] THE LEARNING-CURVE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    CAGIR, B
    RANGRAJ, M
    MAFFUCI, L
    HERZ, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 1994, 4 (06): : 419 - 427
  • [9] The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Voitk, AJ
    Tsao, SGS
    Ignatius, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (03): : 250 - 253
  • [10] THE LEARNING-CURVE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    MEYERS, WC
    SUE, S
    BENNETT, CL
    CHARI, R
    IANNACCHIONE, MA
    MOORE, MJ
    MURRAY, EA
    PAPPAS, TN
    CARMICHAEL, DJ
    DONALD, JM
    DONALD, TT
    VIAR, WN
    NOBLES, ER
    ALBERTSON, DA
    CHALFANT, W
    CROOK, JN
    FERGUSON, CM
    CERISE, EJ
    GANSAR, GF
    COPELAND, EM
    ROUT, WR
    EUBANKS, S
    LUCAS, G
    LUKE, JP
    MASON, E
    NEWMAN, L
    RUBEN, DM
    WILSON, JP
    DUNCAN, T
    BOLTON, JS
    BOWEN, JC
    MCKINNON, WMP
    HAYES, DH
    SARDI, A
    BOUDREAUX, JP
    BAIRD, DR
    BROWN, AG
    CATHCART, RS
    GREGORIE, HB
    PARKER, TH
    WEST, HC
    GILLIS, SP
    BEAZLEY, WS
    CLARY, R
    DARDEN, JR
    AGHAZARIAN, SG
    FARHA, MJ
    FUCHS, JC
    HOOPER, JH
    ROSS, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 170 (01): : 55 - 59