MGMT promoter methylation and glioblastoma: a comparison of analytical methods and of tumor specimens

被引:20
|
作者
Lattanzio, Laura [1 ]
Borgognone, Marzia [2 ]
Mocellini, Cristina [2 ]
Giordano, Fabrizio [3 ]
Favata, Ermanno [4 ]
Fasano, Gaetano [4 ]
Vivenza, Daniela [1 ]
Monteverde, Martino [1 ]
Tonissi, Federica [1 ]
Ghiglia, Annalisa [1 ]
Fillini, Claudia [5 ]
Bernucci, Claudio [4 ]
Merlano, Marco [6 ]
Lo Nigro, Cristiana [1 ]
机构
[1] S Croce Univ Hosp, Lab Canc Genet & Translat Oncol, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
[2] S Croce Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
[3] S Croce Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
[4] S Croce Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
[5] S Croce Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
[6] S Croce Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Med Oncol, I-12100 Cuneo, Italy
来源
关键词
FFPE tissue; Frozen tissue; Methylation-specific PCR; MGMT methylation; Pyrosequencing; O-6-METHYLGUANINE-DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CPG METHYLATION; TEMOZOLOMIDE; GLIOMAS; HYPERMETHYLATION; CONCOMITANT; INACTIVATION; RADIOTHERAPY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.5301/jbm.5000126
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
It is already well known that hypermethylation of the O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is a predictive biomarker of response to temozolomide treatment and of favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Nevertheless, MGMT methylation status has not currently been introduced into routine clinical practice, as the choice of the ideal technique and tissue sample specimen is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare 2 analytical methods, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), and their use on 2 different tissue type samples, snap-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), obtained from a single-center and uniformly treated cohort of 46 GBM patients. We obtained methylation data from all frozen tissues, while no results were obtained for 5 FFPE samples. The highest concordance for methylation was found on frozen tissues (88.5%, 23/26 samples), using PSQ (76.7%, 23/30 samples). Moreover, we confirmed that OS and PFS for patients carrying methylation of the MGMT promoter were longer than for patients with an unmethylated promoter. In conclusion, we considered MSP a limited technique for FFPE tissues due to the high risk of false-positive results; in contrast, our data indicated PSQ as the most powerful method to stratify methylated/unmethylated patients as it allows reaching quantitative results with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, frozen tumor tissues were shown to be the best specimens for MGMT methylation analysis, due to the low DNA degradation and homogeneity in methylation throughout the tumor.
引用
收藏
页码:E208 / E216
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variation in methylation status of MGMT promoter in serial glioblastoma specimens
    Parkinson, J. F.
    McDonald, K. L.
    Wheeler, H.
    Cook, R. J.
    Biggs, M. T.
    Little, N. S.
    Robinson, B. G.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 461 - 462
  • [2] MGMT GENE PROMOTER METHYLATION AND TUMOR LOCATION IN GLIOBLASTOMA
    De Robles, Paula
    Adler, Daniel
    Roldan, Gloria
    Drabycz, Sylvia
    Parney, Ian
    Yan, Elizabeth
    Easaw, Jacob
    Forsyth, Peter A.
    Magliocco, Tony
    Mcintyre, J.
    Cairncross, Gregory
    Mitchell, Ross
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (05) : 861 - 861
  • [3] MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma
    Santosh, Vani
    Sravya, P.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2018, 66 (04) : 1115 - 1116
  • [4] MGMT promoter methylation in Peruvian patients with glioblastoma
    Belmar-Lopez, Carolina
    Castaneda, Carlos A.
    Castillo, Miluska
    Garcia-Corrochano, Pamela
    Orrego, Enrique
    Melendez, Barbara
    Casavilca, Sandro
    Flores, Claudio
    Orrego, Enrique
    [J]. ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [5] Impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly
    Weller, M.
    Hentschel, B.
    Felsberg, J.
    Schackert, G.
    Simon, M.
    Schnell, O.
    Westphal, M.
    Wick, W.
    Pietsch, T.
    Loeffler, M.
    Reifenberger, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [6] Comparison of Two Methods for MGMT Promoter Methylation Status Determination
    Cuaresma, M.
    Mazur, L.
    Baltadjieva, B.
    Mihalov, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 910 - 910
  • [7] An evaluation of MGMT promoter methylation within the methylation subclasses of glioblastoma
    Alnahhas, Iyad
    LaHaye, Stephanie
    Giglio, Pierre
    Mardis, Elaine
    Puduvalli, Vinay
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2020, 2 (01)
  • [8] Heterogeneity of MGMT gene promoter methylation and protein expression in serial specimens in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Pan, Qiang
    Yang, Xue-Jun
    Zhu, Lin
    Song, Chun-Yu
    Diao, Xing-Tao
    Gao, Yong
    Zhu, Jun
    Yue, Xiao
    Li, Hu-Guang
    Cheng, Wei-Ling
    Ning, Yi-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (09): : 17356 - 17366
  • [9] Predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly
    Reifenberger, Guido
    Hentschel, Bettina
    Felsberg, Joerg
    Schackert, Gabriele
    Simon, Matthias
    Schnell, Oliver
    Westphal, Manfred
    Wick, Wolfgang
    Pietsch, Torsten
    Loeffler, Markus
    Weller, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (06) : 1342 - 1350
  • [10] Detection of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma using pyrosequencing
    Xie, Hao
    Tubbs, Raymond
    Yang, Bin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 8 (02): : 1790 - 1796