Cue effectiveness in mitigating postcompletion errors in a routine procedural task

被引:35
|
作者
Chung, Phillip H. [1 ]
Byrne, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
postcompletion error; human error; interface design; Modeling; ACT-R; cognitive architecture; routine procedural task; error mitigation; error intervention; visual cue; visual attention; visual salience; goal memory;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.001
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Postcompletion errors, which are omissions of actions required after the completion of a task's main goal, occur in a variety of everyday procedural tasks. Previous research has demonstrated the difficulty of reducing their frequency by means other than redesigning the task structure [Byrne, M.D., Davis, E.M., 2006. Task structure and postcompletion error in the execution of a routine procedure. Human Factors 48, 627-638]. Nevertheless, finding a successful strategy for mitigation of this type of error may uncover important mechanisms underlying interactive behavior. Two experiments were carried out to test visual cues for their ability to reduce the frequency of postcompletion errors in a computer-based routine procedural task. A cue that was visually salient, just-in-time, and meaningful entirely eliminated the error, whereas cues that were not as specific were ineffective. These results are beyond the predictive capability of extant error identification methods and common design guidelines but are consistent with the work of Altmann and Trafton [2002. Memory for goals: an activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26, 39-83] and Hollnagel [1993. Human Reliability Analysis, Context and Control. Academic Press, London]. Finally, a computational model developed in ACT-R is presented as a first step towards validation of the major findings from the two experiments. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 232
页数:16
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Visual Cues to Reduce Errors in a Routine Procedural Task
    Chung, Phillip H.
    Byrne, Michael D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2004, : 227 - 232
  • [2] Task structure and postcompletion error in the execution of a routine procedure
    Byrne, Michael D.
    Davis, Elizabeth M.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2006, 48 (04) : 627 - 638
  • [3] The Effect of Interruptions on Postcompletion and Other Procedural Errors: An Account Based on the Activation-Based Goal Memory Model
    Li, Simon Y. W.
    Blandford, Ann
    Cairns, Paul
    Young, Richard M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2008, 14 (04) : 314 - 328
  • [4] Practice Increases Procedural Errors After Task Interruption
    Altmann, Erik M.
    Hambrick, David Z.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2017, 146 (05) : 615 - 620
  • [5] Learning a procedural task: Effectiveness of multimedia presentations
    Michas, IC
    Berry, DC
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 14 (06) : 555 - 575
  • [6] A mechanism-based framework for predicting routine procedural errors
    Byrne, MD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 204 - 209
  • [7] Inhibition failures and late errors in the antisaccade task: influence of cue delay
    Aponte, Eduardo A.
    Tschan, Dominic G.
    Stephan, Klaas E.
    Heinzle, Jakob
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 120 (06) : 3001 - 3016
  • [8] A parametric analysis of procedural fidelity errors following mastery of a task: A translational study
    Falakfarsa, Galan
    Brand, Denys
    Bensemann, Joshua
    Jones, Lea
    Miguel, Caio F.
    Heinicke, Megan R.
    Mason, Makenna A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2023, 56 (03) : 607 - 617
  • [9] SINGLE CUE PROBABILITY-LEARNING - DO SUBJECTS GIVE PRIORITY TO SMALL ERRORS OR TASK-REGULARITY
    BJORKMAN, M
    NILSSON, R
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1982, 51 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Examination of Effectiveness of a Performed Procedural Task Using Low-Cost Peripheral Devices in VR
    Grajewski, Damian
    Bun, Pawel
    Gorski, Filip
    VIRTUAL, AUGMENTED AND MIXED REALITY: INTERACTION, NAVIGATION, VISUALIZATION, EMBODIMENT, AND SIMULATION, VAMR 2018, PT I, 2018, 10909 : 403 - 415