Fragility Curves and Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models on the Seismic Assessment of RC Frames Subjected to Structural Pounding

This study aims to evaluate five different methodologies reported in the literature for developing fragility curves to assess the seismic performance of RC structures subjected to structural pounding. In this context, displacement-based and curvature-based fragility curves are developed. The use of probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs) on the fragility assessment of the pounding risk is further estimated. Linear and bilinear PSDMs are developed, while the validity of the assumptions commonly used to produce a PSDM is examined. Finally, the influence of the PSDMs' assumptions on the derivation of fragilities for the structural pounding effect is identified. The examined pounding cases involve the interaction between adjacent RC structures that have equal story heights (floor-to-floor interaction). Results indicate that the fragility assessment of the RC structure that suffers the pounding effect is not affected by the examined methodologies when the performance level that controls the seismic behavior is exceeded at low levels of IM. Thus, the more vulnerable the structure is due to the pounding effect, the more likely that disparities among the fragility curves of the examined methods are eliminated. The use of a linear PSDM fails to properly describe the local inelastic demands of the structural RC member that suffers the impact effect. The PSDM's assumptions are not always satisfied for the examined engineering demand parameters of this study, and thus may induce errors when fragility curves are developed. Nevertheless, errors induced due to the power law model and the homoscedasticity assumptions of the PSDM can be reduced by using the bilinear regression model.