Social impacts of algorithmic decision-making: A research agenda for the social sciences

被引:13
|
作者
Gerdon, Frederic [1 ,2 ]
Bach, Ruben L. [3 ]
Kern, Christoph [3 ]
Kreuter, Frauke [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Mannheim Ctr European Social Res, A 5,6, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ LMU Munchen, Dept Stat, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
BIG DATA & SOCIETY | 2022年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Algorithms; social inequality; fair machine learning; social impacts of AI; algorithmic decision-making; artificial intelligence; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BIAS; AUTOMATION; INEQUALITIES; COMPLACENCY; SOCIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/20539517221089305
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Academic and public debates are increasingly concerned with the question whether and how algorithmic decision-making (ADM) may reinforce social inequality. Most previous research on this topic originates from computer science. The social sciences, however, have huge potentials to contribute to research on social consequences of ADM. Based on a process model of ADM systems, we demonstrate how social sciences may advance the literature on the impacts of ADM on social inequality by uncovering and mitigating biases in training data, by understanding data processing and analysis, as well as by studying social contexts of algorithms in practice. Furthermore, we show that fairness notions need to be evaluated with respect to specific outcomes of ADM systems and with respect to concrete social contexts. Social sciences may evaluate how individuals handle algorithmic decisions in practice and how single decisions aggregate to macro social outcomes. In this overview, we highlight how social sciences can apply their knowledge on social stratification and on substantive domains of ADM applications to advance the understanding of social impacts of ADM.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOCIAL-SCIENCES RESEARCH AND DECISION-MAKING - WEISS,CH
    VONGLINOW, MA
    KERR, S
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 27 (04): : 321 - 322
  • [2] Social context of the issue of discriminatory algorithmic decision-making systems
    Varona, Daniel
    Suarez, Juan Luis
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023,
  • [3] Capturing social impacts for decision-making: a Multicriteria Decision Analysis perspective
    Estevez, Rodrigo A.
    Walshe, Terry
    Burgman, Mark A.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (5-6) : 608 - 616
  • [4] Advancing Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Large Landscape Conservation Through the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region
    Holterman, Devin
    Wright, Pamela
    Jacob, Aerin
    [J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 43 (04) : A1 - A10
  • [5] A research agenda for computing and the social sciences
    Anderson, RE
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 1997, 15 (02) : 123 - 134
  • [6] Ethical Decision-Making in Social Research: A Practical Guide
    Tinker, Anthea
    [J]. QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS, 2009, 10 (04): : 53 - 54
  • [7] Ethical Decision-Making in Social Research: A Practical Guide
    Tolich, Martin
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (04) : 498 - 499
  • [8] Ethical decision-making in social research: a practical guide
    Bell, Linda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 14 (01) : 91 - 93
  • [9] Morals and climate decision-making: insights from social and behavioural sciences
    Lau, Jacqueline D.
    Song, Andrew M.
    Morrison, Tiffany
    Fabinyi, Michael
    Brown, Katrina
    Blythe, Jessica
    Allison, Edward H.
    Adger, William Neil
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 52 : 27 - 35
  • [10] TEACHING SOCIAL DECISION-MAKING
    ELIAS, MJ
    CLABBY, JF
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1988, 45 (06) : 52 - 55