A participatory Bayesian Belief Network approach to explore ambiguity among stakeholders about socio-ecological systems

被引:32
|
作者
Salliou, Nicolas [1 ]
Barnaud, Cecile [1 ]
Vialatte, Aude [1 ,2 ]
Monteil, Claude [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Dynafor 1201, 24 Chemin Borde Rouge, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] Univ Toulouse, INP ENSAT, BP 32607, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
Uncertainty; Subjectivity; Landscape ecology; Biological control; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURAL-RESOURCES; PEST-CONTROL; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.050
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Participatory modelling must often deal with the challenge of ambiguity when diverse stakeholders do not share a common understanding of the problem and measures for its solution. In this paper, we propose a framework and a methodology to elicit ambiguities among different stakeholders by using a participatory Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) modelling approach. Our approach consists of four steps undertaken with stakeholders: (1) co-construction of a consensual conceptual model of their socioecological system, (2) translation of the model into a consensual Bayesian Net structure, (3) individual parametrization of conditional probabilities, and (4) elicitation of ambiguity through the use of scenarios. We tested this methodology on the ambiguity surrounding the effect of an ecological process on a potential innovation in biological control, and it proved useful in eliciting ambiguity. Further research could explore more conflictual or controversial ambiguities to test this methodology in other settings. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 209
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing socio-ecological scenarios: A participatory process for engaging stakeholders
    Allan, Andrew
    Barbour, Emily
    Nicholls, Robert J.
    Hutton, Craig
    Lim, Michelle
    Salehin, Mashfiqus
    Rahman, Md Munsur
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 807
  • [2] Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage harmful algal bloom stakeholders
    Elizabeth R. Van Dolah
    Michael Paolisso
    Kevin Sellner
    Allen Place
    [J]. Aquatic Ecology, 2016, 50 : 577 - 594
  • [3] Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage harmful algal bloom stakeholders
    Van Dolah, Elizabeth R.
    Paolisso, Michael
    Sellner, Kevin
    Place, Allen
    [J]. AQUATIC ECOLOGY, 2016, 50 (03) : 577 - 594
  • [4] Content and complexity of stakeholders? mental models of socio-ecological systems
    Broek, Karlijn L. van den
    Luomba, Joseph
    Broek, Jan van den
    Fischer, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 85
  • [5] Interactive Videos Enhance Learning about Socio-Ecological Systems
    Smithwick, Erica
    Baxter, Emily
    Kim, Kyung
    Edel-Malizia, Stephanie
    Rocco, Stevie
    Blackstock, Dean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 117 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [6] Quantifying resilience of socio-ecological systems through dynamic Bayesian networks
    Franco-Gaviria, Felipe
    Amador-Jimenez, Monica
    Millner, Naomi
    Durden, Charlotte
    Urrego, Dunia H.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [7] Global production network mapping for transforming socio-ecological systems
    Van Holt, Tracy
    Weisman, Wendy
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 20 : 61 - 66
  • [8] The ecosystem approach applied to the management of the coastal socio-ecological systems
    Vadineanu, Angheluta
    [J]. ASSESSMENT OF THE FATE AND EFFECTS OF TOXIC AGENTS ON WATER RESOURCES, 2007, : 199 - 224
  • [9] An integral approach to address socio-ecological systems sustainability and their uncertainties
    Martinez-Fernandez, Julia
    Banos-Gonzalez, Isabel
    Esteve-Selma, Miguel Angel
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 762
  • [10] Defining adaptation measures collaboratively: A participatory approach in the Donana socio-ecological system, Spain
    De Stefano, Lucia
    Hernandez-Mora, Nuria
    Iglesias, Ana
    Sanchez, Berta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 195 : 46 - 55