Comparative Performance of Multi-Period ACOPF and Multi-Period DCOPF under High Integration of Wind Power

被引:6
|
作者
Larrahondo, Diego [1 ]
Moreno, Ricardo [1 ]
Chamorro, Harold R. [2 ]
Gonzalez-Longatt, Francisco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Occidente, Fac Engn, Cali 760030, Colombia
[2] KTH, Royal Inst Technol, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Elect Engn Informat Technol & CybernetInform, N-3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
关键词
optimal power flow; ACOPF; DCOPF; renewable energy; wind power; FLOW; SYSTEMS; FORMULATION; TRENDS; LOAD;
D O I
10.3390/en14154540
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Today, the power system operation represents a challenge given the security and reliability requirements. Mathematical models are used to represent and solve operational and planning issues related with electric systems. Specifically, the AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) and the DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) are tools used for operational and planning purposes. The DCOPF versions correspond to lineal versions of the ACOPF. This is due to the fact that the power flow solution is often hard to obtain with the ACOPF considering all constraints. However, the simplifications use only active power without considering reactive power, voltage values and losses on transmission lines, which are crucial factors for power system operation, potentially leading to inaccurate results. This paper develops a detailed formulation for both DCOPF and ACOPF with multiple generation sources to provide a 24-h dispatching in order to compare the differences between the solutions with different scenarios under high penetration of wind power. The results indicate the DCOPF inaccuracies with respect to the complete solution provided by the ACOPF.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-period carbon integration
    Al-Mohannadi, Dhabia M.
    Alnouri, Sabla Y.
    Bishnu, Sumit K.
    Linke, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 136 : 150 - 158
  • [2] Integration of PEV and PV in Norway Using Multi-Period ACOPF - Case Study
    Zaferanlouei, Salman
    Korpas, Magnus
    Farahmand, Hossien
    Vadlamudi, Vijay Venu
    [J]. 2017 IEEE MANCHESTER POWERTECH, 2017,
  • [3] Distributed Multi-Period DCOPF via an Auxiliary Principle Problem Algorithm
    Alkhraijah, Mohannad
    Alowaifeer, Maad
    Grijalva, Santiago
    Molzahn, Daniel K.
    [J]. 2021 IEEE TEXAS POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (TPEC), 2021, : 1 - 6
  • [4] Performance measurement in multi-period agencies
    Dutta, S
    Reichelstein, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 1999, 155 (01): : 158 - 175
  • [5] Multi-period investment
    不详
    [J]. PORTFOLIO SELECTION AND ASSET PRICING, 2002, 514 : 105 - 127
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Multi-period Portfolio Strategies
    Xiong, Heping
    Xu, Yiheng
    Xiao, Yi
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 266 - 269
  • [7] Pricing Multi-period Dispatch Under Uncertainty
    Guo, Ye
    Tong, Lang
    [J]. 2018 56TH ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2018, : 341 - 345
  • [8] Reduction method for multi-period time series scenarios of wind power
    He, Ye
    Wu, Hongbin
    Ding, Ming
    Bi, Rui
    Hua, Yuting
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 214
  • [9] A MODEL OF MULTI-PERIOD INVESTMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    NASLUND, B
    WHINSTON, A
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1962, 8 (02) : 184 - 200
  • [10] MULTI-PERIOD CONTROL PROBLEM UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    PRESCOTT, EC
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1972, 40 (06) : 1043 - 1058