Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at Mila Basin (Algeria): A Comparative Assessment of Prediction Capability of Advanced Machine Learning Methods

被引:107
|
作者
Merghadi, Abdelaziz [1 ]
Abderrahmane, Boumezbeur [1 ]
Dieu Tien Bui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tebessa, Res Lab Sedimentary Environm Mineral & Water Reso, Tebessa 12002, Algeria
[2] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Business & IT, Geog Informat Syst Grp, Gullbringvegen 36, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway
关键词
landslide; susceptibility mapping; machine learning; GIS; Algeria; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODELS; HAZARD; CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHM; ENSEMBLE; ISLAND; TREE;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi7070268
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Landslide risk prevention requires the delineation of landslide-prone areas as accurately as possible. Therefore, selecting a method or a technique that is capable of providing the highest landslide prediction capability is highly important. The main objective of this study is to assess and compare the prediction capability of advanced machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Mila Basin (Algeria). First, a geospatial database was constructed from various sources. The database contains 1156 landslide polygons and 16 conditioning factors (altitude, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), landforms, rainfall, lithology, stratigraphy, soil type, soil texture, landuse, depth to bedrock, bulk density, distance to faults, distance to hydrographic network, and distance to road networks). Subsequently, the database was randomly resampled into training sets and validation sets using 5 times repeated 10 k-folds cross-validations. Using the training and validation sets, five landslide susceptibility models were constructed, assessed, and compared using Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (NNET), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The prediction capability of the five landslide models was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the ROC curves (AUC), overall accuracy (Acc), and kappa index. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to confirm statistical significance in the differences among the five machine learning models employed in this study. The result showed that the GBM model has the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.8967), followed by the RF model (AUC = 0.8957), the NNET model (AUC = 0.8882), the SVM model (AUC = 0.8818), and the LR model (AUC = 0.8575). Therefore, we concluded that GBM and RF are the most suitable for this study area and should be used to produce landslide susceptibility maps. These maps as a technical framework are used to develop countermeasures and regulatory policies to minimize landslide damages in the Mila Basin. This research demonstrated the benefit of selecting the best-advanced machine learning method for landslide susceptibility assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Knowledge Graph and Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
    Wu, Qirui
    Xie, Zhong
    Tian, Miao
    Qiu, Qinjun
    Chen, Jianguo
    Tao, Liufeng
    Zhao, Yifan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [2] Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Kovacevic, Milos
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT NETWORKING AND COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS (INCOS 2009), 2009, : 273 - +
  • [3] A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)
    Binh Thai Pham
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Bui, Dieu Tien
    Prakash, Indra
    Dholakia, M. B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 84 : 240 - 250
  • [4] Structure and Characteristics of Landslide Input Data and Consequences on Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Prediction Capability
    Oliveira, Sergio C.
    Zezere, Jose Luis
    Garcia, Ricardo A. C.
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 2: LANDSLIDE PROCESSES, 2015, : 189 - 192
  • [5] Comparative study of sampling strategies for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment
    Liu, Xiao-Dong
    Xiao, Ting
    Zhang, Shao-He
    Sun, Ping-He
    Liu, Lei-Lei
    Peng, Zu-Wu
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2024, 38 (12) : 4935 - 4957
  • [6] Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Western External Rif Chain using Machine Learning Methods
    Benmakhlouf, Marouane
    El Kharim, Younes
    Galindo-Zaldivar, Jesus
    Sahrane, Reda
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2023, 9 (12): : 3218 - 3232
  • [7] Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Different Machine Learning Methods in Longnan City, China
    Gao, Jiangping
    Shi, Xiangyang
    Li, Linghui
    Zhou, Ziqiang
    Wang, Junfeng
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [8] Landslide and Wildfire Susceptibility Assessment in Southeast Asia Using Ensemble Machine Learning Methods
    He, Qian
    Jiang, Ziyu
    Wang, Ming
    Liu, Kai
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [9] Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms
    Binh Thai Pham
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Shahabi, Himan
    Omidvar, Ebrahim
    Singh, Sushant K.
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Asl, Dawood Talebpour
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    Nguyen Kim Quoc
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [10] Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Kovacevic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Vozenilek, Vit
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2011, 123 (03) : 225 - 234