Eversion Bile Duct Anastomosis: A Safe Alternative for Bile Duct Size Discrepancy in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

被引:3
|
作者
Leal-Leyte, Pilar [1 ]
McKenna, Greg J. [1 ]
Ruiz, Richard M. [1 ]
Anthony, Tiffany L. [1 ]
Saracino, Giovanna [1 ]
Testa, Giuliano [1 ]
Klintmalm, Goran B. [1 ]
Kim, Peter T. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Simmons Transplant Inst, 3410 Worth St,Suite 950, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
关键词
BILIARY RECONSTRUCTION; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; STRICTURE;
D O I
10.1002/lt.25075
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Bile duct size discrepancy in liver transplantation may increase the risk of biliary complications (BCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of the eversion bile duct anastomosis technique in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with duct-to-duct anastomosis. A total of 210 patients who received a DDLT with duct-to-duct anastomosis from 2012 to 2017 were divided into 2 groups: those who had eversion bile duct anastomosis (n = 70) and those who had standard bile duct anastomosis (n = 140). BC rates were compared between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of biliary strictures (P = 0.20) and leaks (P = 0.17) between the 2 groups. The BC rate in the eversion group was 14.3% and 11.4% in the standard anastomosis group. All the BCs in the eversion group were managed with endoscopic stenting. A severe size mismatch (3:1 ratio) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of biliary strictures (44.4%) compared with a 2:1 ratio (8.2%; P = 0.002). In conclusion, the use of the eversion technique is a safe alternative for bile duct discrepancy in DDLT. However, severe bile duct size mismatch may be a risk factor for biliary strictures with such a technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1018
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eversion Bile Duct Anastomosis: A Safe Alternative for Bile Duct Size Discrepancy in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Kim, Peter T. W.
    McKenna, Gregory J.
    Ruiz, Richard M.
    Dabous, Ali H.
    Saracino, Giovanna
    Klintmalm, Goran B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 : 311 - 311
  • [2] Eversion Bile Duct Anastomosis: A Safe Alternative for Bile Duct Size Discrepancy in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Leyte, Pilar Leal
    McKenna, Greg
    Ruiz, Richard
    Testa, Giuliano
    Anthony, Tiffany
    Saracino, Giovanna
    Klintmalm, Goran
    Kim, Peter
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 83 - 83
  • [3] Bile duct anastomosis using cystic duct in living donor liver transplantation
    Kwon, CH
    Choi, SH
    Yi, NJ
    Suh, KS
    Lee, KU
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (06) : C26 - C26
  • [4] The bile duct anastomosis in liver transplantation
    Seiler, CA
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 16 (02) : 102 - 106
  • [5] Anastomosis bile duct and portal anomaly in living donor liver transplantation
    Chun, K.
    Song, I.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : 237 - 237
  • [6] Anastomosis bile duct and portal anomaly in living donor liver transplantation
    Chun, K.
    Song, I
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : 340 - 340
  • [7] DUCT-TO-DUCT ANASTOMOSIS USING FUNNEL SHAPE RECIPIENT BILE DUCT: A NOVEL TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE BILE DUCT COMPLICATION IN LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Cho, Seong Yeon
    Kim, Seong Hoon
    Han, Sung-Sik
    Kim, Young-Kyu
    Lee, Yumi
    Park, Sang Jae
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : S115 - S116
  • [8] A case of double common bile duct in a deceased donor for transplantation
    Hajime Imamura
    Susumu Eguchi
    A. M. James Shapiro
    Tatsuya Kin
    [J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2017, 39 : 1409 - 1411
  • [9] A case of double common bile duct in a deceased donor for transplantation
    Imamura, Hajime
    Eguchi, Susumu
    Shapiro, A. M. James
    Kin, Tatsuya
    [J]. SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2017, 39 (12) : 1409 - 1411
  • [10] Anastomosis of Portal Vein and Bile Duct Anomaly in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Chun, K.
    Song, I
    Kim, S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (05) : 348 - 348