A Comparative Study of Collision Avoidance Algorithms for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Performance and Robustness to Noise

被引:1
|
作者
Roelofsen, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Gillet, Denis [2 ]
Martinoli, Alcherio [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn, Distributed Intelligent Syst & Algorithms Lab DIS, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Sch Engn, Coordinat & Interact Syst Grp REACT, Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
DISTRIBUTED AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC SYSTEMS | 2019年 / 6卷
关键词
Collision avoidance; Unmanned aerial vehicle; Robustness;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Over the past years, the field of small unmanned aerial vehicles has grown significantly and several applications have appeared, requiring always more autonomous flight. An important remaining challenge for fully autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles is collision avoidance between aircraft. In this work, we will compare two collision avoidance algorithms in terms of performance and robustness to sensor noise. We will leverage both experiments with real vehicles and calibrated, realistic simulations to get an insight of the effect of noise on collision avoidance. Our results show that although algorithms that use velocity as input are better in minimizing velocity variation and generally produces more efficient trajectories, they are less robust to perception noise. On the other hand, position-based algorithms that typically generate slower and longer avoidance maneuvers, become competitive at high levels of sensor noise.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 88
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study of Collision Avoidance Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Alexopoulos, Alexander
    Kandil, Amr
    Orzechowski, Piotr
    Badreddin, Essameddin
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 1969 - 1974
  • [2] Collision Avoidance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in an Urban Environment
    Choi, Daegyun
    Kim, Donghoon
    Lee, Kyuman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (NAECON), 2021, : 25 - 32
  • [3] A Review on Collision Avoidance Systems for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Dushime, Kelvin
    Nkenyereye, Lewis
    Yoo, Seong Ki
    Song, JaeSeung
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT CONVERGENCE (ICTC 2021): BEYOND THE PANDEMIC ERA WITH ICT CONVERGENCE INNOVATION, 2021, : 1150 - 1155
  • [4] Collision avoidance of multi unmanned aerial vehicles: A review
    Huang, Sunan
    Teo, Rodney Swee Huat
    Tan, Kok Kiong
    ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2019, 48 : 147 - 164
  • [5] A Survey of Collision Avoidance Approaches for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Albaker, B. M.
    Rahim, N. A.
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR TECHNICAL POSTGRADUATES (TECHPOS 2009), 2009, : 306 - 312
  • [6] Comparison of Tactile Signals for Collision Avoidance on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Spiss, Stefan
    Kim, Yeongmi
    Haller, Simon
    Harders, Matthias
    HAPTIC INTERACTION: SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 432 : 393 - 399
  • [7] Expansion Rate based Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Lei Xin
    Wang Xiangke
    Li Jie
    Zhang Guozhong
    Shen Lincheng
    2015 34TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2015, : 8393 - 8398
  • [8] Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Collision Avoidance Systems and Approaches
    Yasin, Jawad N.
    Mohamed, Sherif A. S.
    Haghbayan, Mohammad-Hashem
    Heikkonen, Jukka
    Tenhunen, Hannu
    Plosila, Juha
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 105139 - 105155
  • [9] Collision Avoidance Strategies for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Formation Flight
    Seo, Joongbo
    Kim, Youdan
    Kim, Seungkeun
    Tsourdos, Antonios
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 53 (06) : 2718 - 2734
  • [10] Study of Improved Pilot Performance using Automatic Collision Avoidance for Tele-operated Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Bareiss, Daman
    van den Berg, Jur
    Abbott, Jake J.
    Leang, Kam K.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY, SECURITY, AND RESCUE ROBOTICS (SSRR), 2016, : 118 - 124