Shifts of Spatial Attention in Visual and Tactile Working Memory are Controlled by Independent Modality-Specific Mechanisms

被引:5
|
作者
Katus, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Eimer, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Psychol Sci, London WC1E 7HX, England
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Psychol, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland
关键词
Electroencephalography (EEG); event-related potentials (ERPs); Multisensory (tactile; visual); Spatial attention; Working memory (WM); SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; SIMULTANEOUS STORAGE; INFORMATION; FOCUS; REPRESENTATIONS; BINDING; SERIAL; LINKS; MIND;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhz088
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The question whether the attentional control of working memory (WM) is shared across sensory modalities remains controversial. Here, we investigated whether attention shifts in visual and tactile WM are regulated independently. Participants memorized visual and tactile targets in a first memory sample set (S1) before encoding targets in a second sample set (S2). Importantly, visual or tactile S2 targets could appear on the same side as the corresponding S1 targets, or on opposite sides, thus, requiring shifts of spatial attention in visual or tactile WM. The activation of WM representations in modality-specific visual and somatosensory areas was tracked by recording visual and tactile contralateral delay activity (CDA/tCDA). CDA/tCDA components emerged contralateral to the side of visual or tactile S1 targets, and reversed polarity when S2 targets in the same modality appeared on the opposite side. Critically, the visual CDA was unaffected by the presence versus absence of concurrent attention shifts in tactile WM, and the tactile CDA remained insensitive to visual attention shifts. Visual and tactile WM performance was also not modulated by attention shifts in the other modality. These results show that the dynamic control of visual and tactile WM activation processes operates in an independent modality-specific fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 310
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms of spatial attention and expectation
    Zuanazzi, Arianna
    Noppeney, Uta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2020, 20 (08):
  • [2] SUPRAMODAL AND MODALITY-SPECIFIC MECHANISMS FOR STIMULUS-DRIVEN SHIFTS OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL-ATTENTION
    WARD, LM
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1994, 48 (02): : 242 - 259
  • [3] Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations
    Katus, Tobias
    Eimer, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 30 (05) : 644 - 655
  • [4] PARIETAL LOBE MECHANISMS OF SPATIAL ATTENTION - MODALITY-SPECIFIC OR SUPRAMODAL
    FARAH, MJ
    WONG, AB
    MONHEIT, MA
    MORROW, LA
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1989, 27 (04) : 461 - 470
  • [5] Sustained Spatial Attention in Touch: Modality-Specific and Multimodal Mechanisms
    Sambo, Chiara F.
    Forster, Bettina
    [J]. THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2011, 11 : 199 - 213
  • [6] Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention
    Helbig, Hannah B.
    Ernst, Marc O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (01):
  • [7] ATTENTION AND MODALITY-SPECIFIC INTERFERENCE IN VISUAL SHORT-TERM-MEMORY
    PROCTOR, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1978, 4 (03): : 239 - 245
  • [8] Modality-specific control processes in verbal versus spatial working memory
    Watter, Scott
    Heisz, Jennifer J.
    Karle, James W.
    Shedden, Judith M.
    Kiss, Ivan
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1347 : 90 - 103
  • [10] Sources and mechanisms of modality-specific distraction in visual short-term memory
    Mercer, Tom
    Shaw, Raegan
    Fisher, Luke
    [J]. VISUAL COGNITION, 2022, 30 (09) : 617 - 639