Optimal quantum state transformations based on machine learning

被引:5
作者
Zhao, Tian-Hui [1 ]
Wang, Ming-Hao [1 ]
Zhou, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ, Dept Phys, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quantum state transformation; Machine learning; Quantum cloning; CLONING; INFORMATION; CANNOT;
D O I
10.1007/s11128-021-03148-3
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
It is well known that quantum algorithms may solve problems efficiently that are intractable using conventional algorithms. Quantum algorithms can be designed with a set of universal quantum gates that transform input states into desired output states. However, designing quantum algorithms that transform states in desired ways is challenging due to its complexity. In this paper, we propose a machine learning framework for the transformation of unknown states into their corresponding target states. Specifically, a parameterized quantum circuit learns a given task by tuning its parameters. After the learning is done, the circuit is competent for the quantum task. This allows us to circumvent cumbersome circuit design based on universal quantum gates. If perfect transformation is forbidden by quantum theory, an optimal transformation can be obtained in terms of fidelity. This provides a research method to study various quantum no-go theorems that characterize the intrinsic gap between quantum and classical information. As examples, quantum state rotation and quantum state cloning are studied using numerical simulations. We also show the good robustness of our machine learning framework to corrupted training data, which is a very nice property for physical implementation on near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Noncommuting mixed states cannot be broadcast
    Barnum, H
    Caves, CM
    Fuchs, CA
    Jozsa, R
    Schumacher, B
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 76 (15) : 2818 - 2821
  • [2] Generalized no-broadcasting theorem
    Barnum, Howard
    Barrett, Jonathan
    Leifer, Matthew
    Wilce, Alexander
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 99 (24)
  • [3] Experimental Eavesdropping Based on Optimal Quantum Cloning
    Bartkiewicz, Karol
    Lemr, Karel
    Cernoch, Antonin
    Soubusta, Jan
    Miranowicz, Adam
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 110 (17)
  • [4] Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models
    Benedetti, Marcello
    Lloyd, Erika
    Sack, Stefan
    Fiorentini, Mattia
    [J]. QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04)
  • [5] Bennett C H., 1984, P IEEE INT C COMP SY, P175, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TCS.2014.05.025
  • [6] Quantum machine learning
    Biamonte, Jacob
    Wittek, Peter
    Pancotti, Nicola
    Rebentrost, Patrick
    Wiebe, Nathan
    Lloyd, Seth
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 549 (7671) : 195 - 202
  • [7] Quantum fingerprinting
    Buhrman, H
    Cleve, R
    Watrous, J
    de Wolf, R
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 87 (16)
  • [8] Reinforcement Learning in Different Phases of Quantum Control
    Bukov, Marin
    Day, Alexandre G. R.
    Sels, Dries
    Weinberg, Phillip
    Polkovnikov, Anatoli
    Mehta, Pankaj
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [9] Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem
    Buzek, V
    Hillery, M
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 54 (03): : 1844 - 1852
  • [10] Buzek V, 2000, PHYS REV A, V62, DOI [10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R2626, 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.022303]