Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review

被引:377
|
作者
Rupp, F. [1 ]
Liang, L. [1 ]
Geis-Gerstorfer, J. [1 ]
Scheideler, L. [1 ]
Huettig, F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Sect Med Mat Sci & Technol, Osianderstr 2-8, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Prosthodont, Ctr Dent Oral Med & Maxillofacial Surg, Osianderstr 2-8, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Endosseous dental implantation; Roughness; Wettability; Contamination; Plasma; Photofunctionalisation; Photocatalysis; Bioactivity; Osseointegration Peri-implantitis; SCANNING-ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; UV-A; POLYETHERETHERKETONE PEEK; UNDERLYING MECHANISMS; CHEMICAL-MODIFICATION; NANOSCALE TOPOGRAPHY; ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA; TITANIUM SURFACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. During the last decades, several changes of paradigm have modified our view on how biomaterials' surface characteristics influence the bioresponse. After becoming aware of the role of a certain microroughness for improved cellular contact and osseointegration of dental titanium implants, the likewise important role of surface energy and wettability was increasingly strengthened. Very recently, synergistic effects of nanoscaled topographical features and hydrophilicity at the implant/bone interface have been reported. Methods. Questions arise about which surface roughness and wetting data are capable to predict the bioresponse and, ultimately, the clinical performance. Current methods and approaches applied for topographical, wetting and surface energetic analyses are highlighted. Current knowledge of possible mechanisms explaining the influence of roughness and hydrophilicity at the biological interface is presented. Results. Most marketed and experimental surfaces are based on commonly available additive or subtractive surface modifying methods such as blasting, etching or anodizing. Different height, spatial, hybrid and functional roughness parameters have been identified as possible candidates able to predict the outcome at hard and soft tissue interfaces. Likewise, hydrophilic implants have been proven to improve the initial blood contact, to support the wound healing and thereby accelerating the osseointegration. Significance. There is clear relevance for the influence of topographical and wetting characteristics on a macromolecular and cellular level at endosseous implant/biosystem interfaces. However, we are still far away from designing sophisticated implant surfaces with the best possible, selective functionality for each specific tissue or cavity interface. Firstly, because our knowledge of the respective surface related reactions is at best fragmentary. Secondly, because manufacturing of multi-scaled complex surfaces including distinct nanotopographies, wetting properties, and stable cleanliness is still a technical challenge and far away from being reproducibly transferred to implant surfaces. (C) 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 57
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commercially Available Dental Implants: Review of Their Surface Characteristics
    Palmquist, Anders
    Engqvist, Hakan
    Lausmaa, Jukka
    Thomsen, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2012, 2 (02) : 112 - 124
  • [2] Surface Coatings of Dental Implants: A Review
    Inchingolo, Angelo Michele
    Malcangi, Giuseppina
    Ferrante, Laura
    Del Vecchio, Gaetano
    Viapiano, Fabio
    Inchingolo, Alessio Danilo
    Mancini, Antonio
    Annicchiarico, Ciro
    Inchingolo, Francesco
    Dipalma, Gianna
    Minetti, Elio
    Palermo, Andrea
    Patano, Assunta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [3] Surface Modification of Dental Implants - A Review
    Anjum, Shamaa
    Rajasekar, Arvina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2021, 10 (17): : 1246 - 1250
  • [4] Surface Modifications for Zirconia Dental Implants: A Review
    Sun, Lu
    Hong, Guang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 2
  • [5] Surface structure characteristics of dental implants and their potential changes following installation: a literature review
    Aneksomboonpol, Pitchaya
    Mahardawi, Basel
    Nan, Pheeradej Na
    Laoharungpisit, Palawat
    Kumchai, Thongnard
    Wongsirichat, Natthamet
    Aimjirakul, Napapa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2023, 49 (03) : 114 - 124
  • [6] A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics
    Pak, Hyun-Soon
    Yeo, In-Sung
    Yang, Jae-Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2010, 2 (04): : 142 - 147
  • [7] Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
    Sezin, M.
    Crohare, L.
    Ibanez, J. C.
    [J]. OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2016, 10 : 139 - 147
  • [8] Surface characteristics of different zirconia dental implants: A comparative study
    Dewan, Harisha
    Airan, Manish
    Ejaj, Mohamed
    Lakshmi, K. Pratyusha
    Salkar, Manjiri
    Loganathan, Jeevanandam
    Agroya, Pooja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 260 - 261
  • [9] Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Study of Dental Implants With Different Surface Characteristics
    Yeo, In-Sung
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Yang, Jae-Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2008, 87B (02) : 303 - 311
  • [10] Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics
    Lumbikanonda, N
    Sammons, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2001, 16 (05) : 627 - 636