A Combination of the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score and the RENAL Score to Predict Intraoperative Complications in Small Renal Masses

被引:10
|
作者
Jin Dachun [1 ]
Zhang Junyong [1 ]
Zhang Yuanfeng [1 ]
Ren Dong [1 ]
Xu Guangyong [1 ]
Ge Chengguo [1 ]
Wang Delin [2 ]
Zhang Weili [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Urol Surg, 76 Linjiang Rd, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Kidney tumor; Intraoperative complication; RENAL score; Mayo Adhesive Probability score; ADHERENT PERINEPHRIC FAT; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000504767
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate the potential predictive value of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score combined with the RENAL score for intraoperative outcomes in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in an Eastern Asian population. Methods: An initial of 388 patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic NSS were identified. MAP and RENAL scores were calculated according to CT and a logistic regression model was adopted as a combination of the RENAL score and the MAP score. Results: A total of 293 patients were included. The overall intraoperative complication rate was 7.5% (21 cases). The MAP score was found to correlate with operation time (OT; r = 0.169), estimated blood loss (EBL; r = 0.318), and intraoperative complications (r = 0.242). The RENAL score was correlated with warm is-chemia time (r = 0.503), OT (r = 0.334), intraoperative complications (r = 0.178), and EBL (r = 0.218). The MAP score and the RENAL score were reliable predictors of overall intraoperative complications, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.728 and 0.759, respectively. After combination of these 2 scores, the AUC of overall intra-operative complications was improved with statistical significance (AUC = 0.847, combination vs. RENAL score: p = 0.044 < 0.05; combination vs. MAP score: p = 0.005 < 0.05). Conclusion: The MAP score is an important predictor of EBL, OT, and intraoperative complications in retroperitoneal laparoscopic NSS and its combination with the RENAL score showed a superior predictive value compared to a single score in overall intraoperative complications. The MAP score might be considered in preoperative radiologic aspects as regularly as the RENAL score.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 147
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mayo Adhesive Probability score to predict renal function following partial nephrectomy.
    Nicaise, Edouard
    Schmeusser, Benjamin
    Shah, Yash
    Futral, Cameron
    Ambadi, Sriram
    Imtiaz, Nahar
    Patil, Dattatraya H.
    Ogan, Kenneth
    Master, Viraj A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 379 - 379
  • [2] Development of a simple nomogram to estimate risk for intraoperative complications before partial nephrectomy based on the Mayo Adhesive Probability score combined with the RENAL nephrometry score
    Tan, Xiaojun
    Jin, Dachun
    Hu, Jian
    Zhang, Weili
    Zhou, Yu
    Li, Yunxiang
    Zhang, Yuanfeng
    Wu, Ji
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 62 (04) : 455 - 461
  • [3] Letter to the editor: Development of a simple nomogram to estimate risk for intraoperative complications before partial nephrectomy based on the Mayo Adhesive Probability score combined with the RENAL nephrometry score
    Temiz, Mustafa Zafer
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 62 (06) : 697 - 698
  • [4] Letter to the editor: Development of a simple nomogram to estimate risk for intraoperative complications before partial nephrectomy based on the Mayo Adhesive Probability score combined with the RENAL nephrometry score reply
    Jin, Dachun
    Tan, Xiaojun
    Hu, Jian
    Zhang, Weili
    Zhou, Yu
    Li, Yunxiang
    Zhang, Yuanfeng
    Wu, Ji
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 62 (06) : 699 - 699
  • [5] Prediction of Postoperative Risks in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using RENAL, Mayo Adhesive Probability and Renal Pelvic Score
    Bier, Simone
    Aufderklamm, Stefan
    Todenhfer, Tilman
    Kruck, Stephan
    Schuster, Karoline
    Rausch, Steffen
    Othman, Ahmed
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Schwentner, Christian
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Bier, Georg
    Bedke, Jens
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (03) : 1369 - 1373
  • [6] A comparison of perinephric fat surface area and Mayo Adhesive Probability score in predicting malignancy in T1 renal masses
    Bernstein, Ari P.
    Fram, Ethan B.
    Sankin, Alexander
    Kovac, Evan
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    DiVito, Joseph
    Stern, Joshua M.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (11) : 499.e17 - 499.e22
  • [7] USEFULNESS OF THE MAYO ADHESIVE PROBABILITY SCORE AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR RENAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Endo, Yu
    Yoshida, Yuki
    Matsuoka, Yuta
    Koguchi, Tomoyuki
    Hata, Junya
    Sato, Yuichi
    Akaihata, Hidenori
    Kataoka, Masao
    Ogawa, Soichiro
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1035 - E1035
  • [8] Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is Associated With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression-free Survival
    Thiel, David D.
    Davidiuk, Andrew J.
    Meschia, Camille
    Serie, Daniel
    Custer, Kaitlynn
    Petrou, Steven P.
    Parker, Alexander S.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 89 : 54 - 60
  • [9] Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Does Not Have Prognostic Ability in Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Schmeusser, Benjamin N.
    Manalo, Tad A.
    Liu, Yuan
    Shah, Yash B.
    Ali, Adil
    Armas-Phan, Manuel
    Patil, Dattatraya H.
    Nabavizadeh, Reza
    Ogan, Kenneth
    Master, Viraj A.
    REVISTA PUBLICACIONES, 2022, 52 (02): : 19 - 25
  • [10] MAYO ADHESIVE PROBABILITY (MAP) SCORE IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL
    Thiel, David
    Davidiuk, Andrew
    Meschia, Camille
    Serie, Daniel
    Custer, Kaitlynn
    Petrou, Steven
    Parker, Alex
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E835 - E835