Effect of choice complexity on design efficiency in conjoint choice experiments

被引:12
|
作者
Danthurebandara, Vishva Manohara [1 ]
Yu, Jie [1 ]
Vandebroek, Martina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Business & Econ, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Stat Res Ctr, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Choice complexity; Optimal experimental design; Entropy; Heteroscedastic conditional logit model; Between respondent variability; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspi.2011.01.008
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Conjoint choice experiments have become a powerful tool to explore individual preferences. The consistency of respondents' choices depends on the choice complexity. For example, it is easier to make a choice between two alternatives with few attributes than between five alternatives with several attributes. In the latter case it will be much harder to choose the preferred alternative which is reflected in a higher response error. Several authors have dealt with this choice complexity in the estimation stage but very little attention has been paid to set up designs that take this complexity into account. The core issue of this paper is to find out whether it is worthwhile to take this complexity into account in the design stage. We construct efficient semi-Bayesian D-optimal designs for the heteroscedastic conditional logit model which is used to model the across respondent variability that occurs due to the choice complexity. The degree of complexity is measured by the entropy, as suggested by Swait and Adamowicz (2001). The proposed designs are compared with a semi-Bayesian D-optimal design constructed without taking the complexity into account. The simulation study shows that it is much better to take the choice complexity into account when constructing conjoint choice experiments. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2276 / 2286
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rank-order choice-based conjoint experiments: Efficiency and design
    Vermeulen, Bart
    Goos, Peter
    Vandebroek, Martina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2011, 141 (08) : 2519 - 2531
  • [2] The 'no-choice' alternative in conjoint choice experiments
    Haaijer, R
    Kamakura, W
    Wedel, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2001, 43 (01): : 93 - 106
  • [3] Model-robust design of conjoint choice experiments
    Yu, Jie
    Goos, Peter
    Vandebroek, Martina
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 37 (08) : 1603 - 1621
  • [4] Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    Carson, Richard T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2010, 3 (03) : 57 - 72
  • [5] Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments
    Haaijer, R
    Kamakura, W
    Wedel, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (03) : 376 - 382
  • [6] New Design of Choice Sets for Choice-based Conjoint
    Kim, Bu-Yong
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2012, 25 (05) : 847 - 857
  • [7] Models and optimal designs for conjoint choice experiments including a no-choice option
    Vermeulen, Bart
    Goos, Peter
    Vandebroek, Martina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2008, 25 (02) : 94 - 103
  • [8] Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Liebe, Ulf
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2009, 85 (03) : 515 - 528
  • [9] Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Valdimar Sigurdsson
    R. G. Vishnu Menon
    Asle Fagerstrøm
    [J]. The Behavior Analyst, 2017, 40 : 373 - 391
  • [10] Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Sigurdsson, Valdimar
    Menon, R. G. Vishnu
    Fagerstrom, Asle
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2017, 40 (02): : 373 - 391