Sacroperineal Reconstruction With Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps After Resection of Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Anorectal Malignancy

被引:1
|
作者
Khalil, Haitham H. [1 ]
McArthur, David [2 ]
Youssif, Sherif [1 ,3 ]
Alsharkawy, Kareem [1 ,4 ]
Hendrickse, Charles [2 ]
Dilworth, Mark [2 ]
Karandikar, Sharad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Solihull Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Solihull Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Plast Surg Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[4] Tanta Univ, Plast & Rceonstruct Surg Dept, Fac Med, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
perineal reconstruction; inferior; gluteal; sacral; rectal cancer; advanced; VAGINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; PELVIC EXENTERATION; PERINEAL RECONSTRUCTION; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; EXCISION; CLOSURE; EXPERIENCE; SUPERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003258
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Modern interdisciplinary concepts with involvement of various surgical specialties can considerably reduce perioperative morbidity after sacroperineal resection of locally advanced primary or recurrent anorectal malignancies. Resultant defects can represent a major challenge for reconstruction particularly with chemoradiotherapy. The aim is to assess the long-term outcomes of sacroperineal reconstruction using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. We performed a retrospective data analysis on 31 patients who were treated with inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps (n = 61) over the period 2009-2021. The demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes with special focus on wound infection and dehiscence were recorded. The median age was 42 year (range, 25-82 years) with preponderance of males (n = 21). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 80 months. Early minor complications included superficial wound dehiscence (3), which was managed conservatively, whereas the major (2) included deep wound collection and infection (1), which required surgical drainage, and perineal hernia, which required repair. All flaps survived completely. Inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps are safe, robust, and reliable with less donor side morbidity and positive impact on quality of life. It should be considered as a valuable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of sacroperineal defects within a multidisciplinary setting.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 311
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps
    Hainsworth, A.
    Al Akash, M.
    Roblin, P.
    Mohanna, P.
    Ross, D.
    George, M. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (04) : 584 - 588
  • [2] Perineal reconstruction using an inferior gluteal artery perforator flap after abdominoperineal resection
    Albano, Miguel Nico
    Louro, Joao Mendes
    Brito, Iris
    Ramos, Sara
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2019, 12 (09)
  • [3] Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Bilateral Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps
    Satake, Toshihiko
    Muto, Mayu
    Ogawa, Marina
    Shibuya, Mai
    Yasumura, Kazunori
    Kobayashi, Shinji
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Maegawa, Jiro
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (03)
  • [4] SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAPS IN RECONSTRUCTION OF GLUTEAL AND PERIANAL/PERINEAL HIDRADENITIS SUPPURATIVA LESIONS
    Unal, Cigdem
    Yirmibesoglu, Oktay Ahmet
    Ozdemir, Jale
    Hasdemir, Mustafa
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (07) : 539 - 544
  • [5] Simultaneous Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With In-the-Crease Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps
    Levine, Joshua L.
    Miller, Quintessa
    Vasile, Julie
    Khoobehi, Kamran
    Craigie, James
    Wise, Matthew W.
    Allen, Robert J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 63 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [6] PERINEAL AND POSTERIOR VAGINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAPS
    Wagstaff, Marcus J. D.
    Rozen, Warren M.
    Whitaker, Iain S.
    Enajat, Morteza
    Audolfsson, Thorir
    Acosta, Rafael
    MICROSURGERY, 2009, 29 (08) : 626 - 629
  • [7] Outcomes of perineal reconstruction with inferior gluteal artery myocutaneous flaps and primary closure following abdominoperineal resection
    Gultekin, Sinem
    Gartrell, Richard
    Lu, Lucy
    Croxford, Matthew
    Faragher, Ian
    Chan, Steven T. F.
    Yeung, Justin M. C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (11) : 2968 - 2973
  • [8] 7-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH PERINEAL RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING ABDOMINOPERINEAL OR MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION USING INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAPS
    Pramateftakis, M-G
    Creasy, H.
    Roblin, P.
    Mohanna, P-N
    Ross, D.
    Schizas, A.
    George, M.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A537 - A537
  • [9] Comparison of inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps versus vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps in the reconstruction of perineal wounds
    Benedict, Katherine C.
    Songcharoen, Somjade J.
    Stephens, Kristin L.
    Winter, Anna L.
    Edwards, Shelley R.
    Campbell, Christopher A.
    Arnold, Peter B.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 84 : 514 - 520
  • [10] Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
    Thiel, J. T.
    Welskopf, H. L.
    Yurttas, C.
    Farzaliyev, F.
    Daigeler, A.
    Bachmann, R.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (13)