Sensitivity of the HSPF Model to Land Use/Land Cover Datasets

被引:0
|
作者
Diaz-Ramirez, Jairo [1 ]
Duan, Zhiyong [1 ]
MeAnally, William [1 ]
Martin, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Hydrology simulation; Lumped model; Alabama; Mississippi;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) in interface with the Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint (BASINS) was used to evaluate the impact on hydrology components of the Luxapallila Creek watershed due to different land use/land cover (LU/LC) databases. The 1,770-km(2) watershed is located in Alabama and Mississippi. Simulation of the watershed processes were tested at the hillslope and at the watershed outlet for the period between 1985 and 2003. Three LU/LC databases were evaluated: the GIRAS, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the National Land Cover Data (NLCD). The three LU/LC databases showed that more than 70% of the watershed area is covered by forest. Forest areas produced small changes among databases. Forest cover mechanisms were the main source of water losses. The model was more sensitive to daily time steps than annual periods when the MODIS and NLCD datasets were compared to the GIRAS database. In general, the MODIS dataset showed a higher variation on hydrology simulations than the NLCD database when both LU/LC databases were compared to the GIRAS database.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recent land cover changes and sensitivity of the model simulations to various land cover datasets for China
    Liang Chen
    Zhuguo Ma
    Rezaul Mahmood
    Tianbao Zhao
    Zhenhua Li
    Yanping Li
    [J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2017, 129 : 395 - 408
  • [2] Recent land cover changes and sensitivity of the model simulations to various land cover datasets for China
    Chen, Liang
    Ma, Zhuguo
    Mahmood, Rezaul
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Li, Zhenhua
    Li, Yanping
    [J]. METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2017, 129 (04) : 395 - 408
  • [3] Evaluation of land use/land cover datasets in hydrological modelling using the SWAT model
    Alawi, Sayed Amir
    Ozkul, Sevinc
    [J]. H2OPEN JOURNAL, 2023, 6 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [4] Evaluation of land use/land cover datasets for urban watershed modeling
    Burian, SJ
    Brown, MJ
    McPherson, TN
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (09) : 269 - 276
  • [5] Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: A Comparison of Dynamic World, World Cover and Esri Land Cover
    Venter, Zander S.
    Barton, David N.
    Chakraborty, Tirthankar
    Simensen, Trond
    Singh, Geethen
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [6] Sensitivity of a standard Land Use Cover change cellular automata model to resample input Land Use Cover maps
    Garcia-Alvarez, David
    Camacho Olmedo, Maria Teresa
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 103 (04) : 540 - 560
  • [7] Land use and cover changes on the Loess Plateau: A comparison of six global or national land use and cover datasets
    Sun, Wenyi
    Ding, Xiaotong
    Su, Jingbo
    Mu, Xingmin
    Zhang, Yongqiang
    Gao, Peng
    Zhao, Guangju
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 119
  • [8] Sensitivity of land use change emission estimates to historical land use and land cover mapping
    Peng, Shushi
    Ciais, Philippe
    Maignan, Fabienne
    Li, Wei
    Chang, Jinfeng
    Wang, Tao
    Yue, Chao
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2017, 31 (04) : 626 - 643
  • [9] The sensitivity of a land surface parameterization scheme to the choice of remotely sensed land-cover datasets
    Oleson, KW
    Driese, KL
    Maslanik, JA
    Emery, WJ
    Reiners, WA
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1997, 125 (07) : 1537 - 1555
  • [10] Land use or land cover?
    Comber, A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (04) : 199 - 201