Optimal sensor placement for modal parameter identification using signal subspace correlation techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Cherng, AP [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl I Lan Inst Technol, Dept Agr Machinery Engn, I Lan 26015, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Placing vibration sensors at appropriate locations plays an important role in experimental modal analysis, in order to ultimately describe the system under considerations. To this end, maximizing the determinant of Fisher information Matrix has been shown to provide optimal solutions. Some methods have been proposed in the literature, such as maximizing the determinant of the diagonal elements of mode shape correlation matrix, ranking the sensor contributions by Hankel Singular Values (HSVs), and using perturbation theory to achieve minimum estimate variance, etc. The objectives of this work were to systematically analyze existing methods and to propose methods that improve their performance or accelerate the searching process. The approach used in this paper is based on the analytical formulation of SVD for a candidate blocked Hankel matrix using Signal Subspace Correlation (SSC) techniques developed earlier by the author. The SSC accounts for factors that contribute to the estimated results, such as mode shapes, damping ratios, sampling rate, and matrix size (or number of data used). With the aid of SSC, it will be shown in this article that using information of mode shapes and singular values are equivalent under certain conditions. The results of this work not only consist with those of existing methods, but also demonstrate a more general viewpoint to the optimization problem. Consequently, the insight of the sensor placement problem is clearly unfolded. A modified method that treats targeted modes equally is then proposed. Finally, a hybrid method that possesses advantages of existing methods is also proposed and believed to be efficient and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 861
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal sensor placement for modal parameter identification using signal subspace correlation techniques
    Cherng, AP
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2003, 17 (02) : 361 - 378
  • [2] Optimal sensor placement for modal parameter identification using signal subspace correlation techniques
    Cherng, A.-P.
    [J]. Shock and Vibration Digest, 2000, 32 (01):
  • [3] Optimal sensor placement techniques for modal identification of historical masonry structures
    Shabani, Amirhosein
    Kioumarsi, Mahdi
    [J]. 23 EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FRACTURE, ECF23, 2022, 42 : 147 - 154
  • [4] Optimal sensor placement and assessment for modal identification
    Liu, Kang
    Yan, Ren-Jun
    Soares, C. Guedes
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 165 : 209 - 220
  • [5] Optimal sensor placement for structural parameter identification
    Corrado Chisari
    Lorenzo Macorini
    Claudio Amadio
    Bassam A. Izzuddin
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55 : 647 - 662
  • [6] Optimal sensor placement for structural parameter identification
    Chisari, Corrado
    Macorini, Lorenzo
    Amadio, Claudio
    Izzuddin, Bassam A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (02) : 647 - 662
  • [7] Optimal sensor placement for modal identification of repetitive structures
    Zhang, J.
    De Roeck, G.
    Reynders, E.
    Lombaert, G.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING AND USD2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, : 2355 - 2364
  • [8] Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods
    Kammer, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1996, 19 (03) : 729 - 731
  • [9] Optimal multiaxial sensor placement for modal identification of large structures
    He, Longjun
    Lian, Jijian
    Ma, Bin
    Wang, Haijun
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2014, 21 (01): : 61 - 79
  • [10] Sensor placement for modal identification
    Stephan, Cyrille
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 27 : 461 - 470