The recognition potential: Semantic processing or the detection of differences between stimuli?

被引:12
|
作者
Pu, J
Peng, DL [1 ]
Demaree, HA
Song, Y
Wei, JH
Xu, L
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2005年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
recognition potential; semantic processing; detection of difference; Chinese visual stimuli; event-related potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The recognition potential is traditionally described as an electrical index elicited when subjects view a recognizable stimulus. Recent studies further show that it may be influenced by semantic processing. In this study, we investigated whether this observed influence is really produced by differences in semantic processing or whether it might be caused by the detection of differences between sequentially presented stimuli. In two different experiments, we systematically altered the type of background images presented while keeping the recognizable word constant. Analyses revealed that the same recognizable words elicited an RP with different amplitudes and latencies when viewed under different background conditions. Control stimuli, which were identical to background stimuli, did not elicit the RP. Hence, we postulate that when using the rapid stream stimulation paradigm, RP might also be influenced by the detection of differences between sequentially input stimuli. It is necessary to clarify whether RP changes are caused by the processing of the stimuli or by the detection of difference between successively input stimuli before any conclusion could be made. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 282
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf, Anke
    Knops, Andre
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    Willmes, Klaus
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2008, 72 (06): : 648 - 656
  • [2] Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Anke Huckauf
    Andre Knops
    Hans-Christoph Nuerk
    Klaus Willmes
    Psychological Research, 2008, 72 : 648 - 656
  • [3] VISUAL-FIELD DIFFERENCES IN A DEEPER SEMANTIC PROCESSING TASK WITH KANJI STIMULI
    HAYASHI, R
    HATTA, T
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 24 (03) : 111 - 117
  • [4] Neural Processing of Repeated Search Targets Depends Upon the Stimuli: Real World Stimuli Engage Semantic Processing and Recognition Memory
    Drew, Trafton
    Williams, Lauren H.
    Jones, Christopher Michael
    Luria, Roy
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [5] Detection of differences between syntactic and semantic similarities
    Hirano, S
    Tsumoto, S
    ROUGH SETS AND CURRENT TRENDS IN COMPUTING, 2004, 3066 : 529 - 538
  • [6] Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation
    Chen, Li
    Li, Weina
    Shi, Xiaoke
    Han, Meiling
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2024, 31 (06) : 1463 - 1473
  • [7] Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation
    Chen, Li
    Li, Weina
    Shi, Xiaoke
    Han, Meiling
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2022,
  • [8] Differences in Emotion Processing Are Explained by Differences in Stimuli
    Hamon-Hill, Cindy
    Barresi, John
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 325 - 325
  • [9] The recognition potential:: An early measure of semantic processing in basal extrastriate areas
    Martín-Loeches, M
    Hinojosa, JA
    Gómez-Jarabo, G
    Rubia, FJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (01) : 70 - 70
  • [10] Demonstrating the qualitative differences between semantic aphasia and semantic dementia: A novel exploration of nonverbal semantic processing
    Noonan, Krist A.
    Jefferies, Elizabeth
    Eshan, Sheeba
    Garrard, Peter
    Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon
    BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2013, 26 (1-2) : 7 - 20