Validation of CMIP5 multimodel ensembles through the smoothness of climate variables

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Myoungji [1 ]
Jun, Mikyoung [2 ]
Genton, Marc G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Appl Math & Computat Sci, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, CEMSE Div, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
关键词
composite likelihood; Gaussian process; NCEP/NCAR reanalysis; restricted likelihood; surface temperature anomaly; uncertainty quantification; variogram; CROSS-COVARIANCE MODELS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; SPATIAL DATA; PROJECTIONS; REANALYSIS; DEPENDENCE; FIELDS; SCALE; RAIN;
D O I
10.3402/tellusa.v67.23880
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Smoothness is an important characteristic of a spatial process that measures local variability. If climate model outputs are realistic, then not only the values at each grid pixel but also the relative variation over nearby pixels should represent the true climate. We estimate the smoothness of long-term averages for land surface temperature anomalies in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), and compare them by climate regions and seasons. We also compare the estimated smoothness of the climate outputs in CMIP5 with those of reanalysis data. The estimation is done through the composite likelihood approach for locally self-similar processes. The composite likelihood that we consider is a product of conditional likelihoods of neighbouring observations. We find that the smoothness of the surface temperature anomalies in CMIP5 depends primarily on the modelling institution and on the climate region. The seasonal difference in the smoothness is generally small, except for some climate regions where the average temperature is extremely high or low.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    Hauser, Mathias
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [2] Projections of Future Drought by CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles in Central Asia
    Ta, Zhijie
    Li, Kaiyu
    Yu, Yang
    Yang, Meilin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [3] Assessment of CMIP5 multimodel mean for the historical climate of Africa
    Zebaze, Sinclaire
    Jain, Shipra
    Salunke, Popat
    Shafiq, Shayan
    Mishra, Saroj K.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 20 (08):
  • [4] Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in China by the CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles
    Zhou, Botao
    Wen, Qiuzi Han
    Xu, Ying
    Song, Lianchun
    Zhang, Xuebin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (17) : 6591 - 6611
  • [5] Maritime Continent seasonal climate biases in AMIP experiments of the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble
    Toh, Ying Ying
    Turner, Andrew G.
    Johnson, Stephanie J.
    Holloway, Christopher E.
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 50 (3-4) : 777 - 800
  • [6] Maritime Continent seasonal climate biases in AMIP experiments of the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble
    Ying Ying Toh
    Andrew G. Turner
    Stephanie J. Johnson
    Christopher E. Holloway
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2018, 50 : 777 - 800
  • [7] Projection and uncertainty of precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 multimodel ensembles over nine major basins in China
    Xu, Kai
    Xu, Bingbo
    Ju, Jiali
    Wu, Chuanhao
    Dai, Heng
    Hu, Bill X.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2019, 226 : 122 - 137
  • [8] Sahel rainfall in multimodel CMIP5 decadal hindcasts
    Martin, E. R.
    Thorncroft, C.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (06) : 2169 - 2175
  • [9] Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections
    Sillmann, J.
    Kharin, V. V.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Zhang, X.
    Bronaugh, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (06) : 2473 - 2493
  • [10] Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
    Lehner, Flavio
    Deser, Clara
    Maher, Nicola
    Marotzke, Jochem
    Fischer, Erich M.
    Brunner, Lukas
    Knutti, Reto
    Hawkins, Ed
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (02) : 491 - 508