Pro-poor Land Transfers and the Importance of Land Abundance and Ethnicity in The Gambia

被引:5
|
作者
Beck, Ulrik [1 ]
Bjerge, Benedikte [2 ]
机构
[1] Danish Econ Councils, Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
Africa; Gambia; land; transfers; networks; norms; RISK-SHARING NETWORKS; PRIVATE TRANSFERS; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; INSURANCE; MARKETS; TOBIT; NORMALITY; MOTIVES; IMPACT; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.013
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
We ask whether there is empirical evidence that supports the existence of norm-based access rules that give poor households access to important production resources. A substantial literature has investigated informal insurance schemes, which trigger supporting exchanges after negative shocks have occurred. This paper is instead concerned with material exchanges that take place before shocks occur, which has received far less attention in the economic literature. We employ a dataset of 51 rural villages in The Gambia, and we focus on access to the most important production resource in our context land. We find that poor households are more likely to receive seasonal land usage rights. We also show that these exchanges are more likely to occur in villages where land is abundant and where ethnic fractionalization is low. We argue that this is consistent with the existing qualitative evidence, which argues that informal exchange is thought to be disappearing due to population increases and ethnic fractionalization. Our findings highlight the importance of attention to the local (i.e., village-level) context for assessing welfare and conducting effective policy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 140
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Pro-poor land transfers in the presence of landslides: New insights on norms in land markets
    Mertens, Kewan
    Vranken, Liesbet
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 101
  • [2] Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique
    Akram-Lodhi, Haroon
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (01) : 117 - 120
  • [3] Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique
    Kerkvliet, Benedict J. Tria
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2009, 40 (02) : 401 - 402
  • [4] Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique
    Deere, Carmen Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE, 2009, 9 (03) : 437 - 439
  • [5] Urban land transformation for pro-poor economies
    Benjamin, S
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2004, 35 (02) : 177 - 187
  • [6] Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented
    Zevenbergen, Jaap
    Augustinus, Clarissa
    Antonio, Danilo
    Bennett, Rohan
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 31 : 595 - 604
  • [7] A Pro-Poor Land Recordation System - Towards a Design
    Verstappen, Leon
    Zevenbergen, Jaap
    [J]. UNIFORM LAW REVIEW, 2012, 17 (1-2) : 57 - 72
  • [8] Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance
    Borras, Saturnino M., Jr.
    Franco, Jennifer C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE, 2010, 10 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [9] Is land certification pro-poor? Evidence from Ethiopia
    Ayalew, Hailemariam
    Admasu, Yeshwas
    Chamberlin, Jordan
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 107
  • [10] On the need for pro-poor land administration in disaster risk management
    Unger, E. -M.
    Zevenbergen, J.
    Bennett, R.
    [J]. SURVEY REVIEW, 2017, 49 (357) : 437 - 448