On weighting the rates in non-response weights

被引:93
|
作者
Little, RJ
Vartivarian, S
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Stat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
sampling weights; survey inference; unit non-response adjustment;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1513
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A basic estimation strategy in sample surveys is to weight units inversely proportional to the probability of selection and response. Response weights in this method are usually estimated by the inverse of the sample-weighted response rate in an adjustment cell, that is, the ratio of the sum of the sampling weights of respondents in a cell to the sum of the sampling weights for respondents and non-respondents in that cell. We show by simulations that weighting the response rates by the sampling weights to adjust for design variables is either incorrect or unnecessary. It is incorrect, in the sense of yielding biased estimates of population quantities, if the design variables are related to survey non-response; it is unnecessary if the design variables are unrelated to survey non-response. The correct approach is to model non-response as a function of the adjustment cell and design variables, and to estimate the response weight as the inverse of the estimated response probability from this model. This approach can be implemented by creating adjustment cells that include design variables in the cross-classification, if the number of cells created in this way is not too large. Otherwise, response propensity weighting can be applied. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1599
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjusting for Unit Non-Response in Surveys Through Weighting
    Carkin, Danielle Marie
    Tracy, Paul E.
    [J]. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2015, 61 (01) : 143 - 158
  • [2] A comparison of two methods to adjust for non-response bias: field substitution and weighting non-response adjusments based on response propensity
    Vives, Alejandra
    Ferreccio, Catterina
    Marshall, Guillermo
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [3] The use of weights to account for non-response and drop-out
    Michael Höfler
    Hildegard Pfister
    Roselind Lieb
    Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
    [J]. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2005, 40 : 291 - 299
  • [4] The use of weights to account for non-response and drop-out
    Höfler, M
    Pfister, H
    Lieb, R
    Wittchen, HU
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (04) : 291 - 299
  • [5] Questionnaire surveys of dentists - response rates and non-response bias.
    Parashos, P
    Morgan, MV
    Messer, HH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 105 - 105
  • [6] Partial optional randomized response technique with calibration weighting to adjust non-response in successive sampling
    Priyanka, Kumari
    Trisandhya, Pidugu
    Kumar, Ajay
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, 2021, 28 (05) : 493 - 510
  • [7] Item non-response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires
    Denscombe, Martyn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 12 (04) : 281 - 291
  • [8] The impact of non-response weighting in health surveys for estimates on primary health care utilization
    Jensen, Heidi Amalie Rosendahl
    Lau, Cathrine Juel
    Davidsen, Michael
    Feveile, Helene Birgitte
    Christensen, Anne Illemann
    Ekholm, Ola
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 (03): : 450 - 455
  • [9] Weighting for item non-response in attitude scales by using latent variable models with covariates
    Moustaki, I
    Knott, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2000, 163 : 445 - 459
  • [10] Mail surveys of general practice physicians: response rates and non-response bias
    Young, J
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2005, 135 (13-14) : 187 - 188