Variations in backscatter observed in PMMA whole-body dosimetry slab phantoms

被引:5
|
作者
Schwahn, Scott O. [1 ]
Gesell, Thomas F. [2 ]
机构
[1] US DOE, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
[2] Idaho State Univ, Dept Phys, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncm391
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a useful material for dosimetry phantoms in many ways including approximate tissue equivalence, stability, accessibility and ease of use. However, recent studies indicate that PMMA may have some unanticipated variation in backscatter from one phantom to another. While the reasons behind the variations have not been identified, it has been demonstrated that the backscatter from one phantom to another may vary by as much as 15%, resulting in a dosemeter response variation of as much as 5%. This unexpected contribution to uncertainty in delivered dose to a dosemeter may be quite large compared to the normally estimated uncertainty, potentially causing problems with calibration and performance testing. This paper includes data supporting the differences in backscatter among phantoms, and results from tests on the phantoms performed in an effort to identify possible causes.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparisons inhomogeneity of photon fields and backscatter factors for PMMA and water slab phantoms
    Stankovic, S
    Kovacevic, M
    Vukcevic, M
    Avramovic, I
    Cuknic, O
    [J]. IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 4, 1996, : D209 - D211
  • [2] Generating Patient-Specific Dosimetry Phantoms with Whole-Body Diffeomorphic Image Registration
    Tward, D. J.
    Ceritoglu, C.
    Sturgeon, G.
    Segars, W. P.
    Miller, M. I.
    Ratnanather, J. T.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE 37TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC), 2011,
  • [3] Flexible Dosimeter Bands for Whole-Body Dosimetry
    Kim, T.
    Fahimian, B.
    Pratx, G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3871 - 3871
  • [4] EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION BY DOSIMETRY
    MALCHAIRE, J
    LEVIE, F
    RENS, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1982, 25 (04): : 373 - 380
  • [5] EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry
    Hindorf, Cecilia
    Glatting, Gerhard
    Chiesa, Carlo
    Linden, Ola
    Flux, Glenn
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (06) : 1238 - 1250
  • [6] EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry
    Cecilia Hindorf
    Gerhard Glatting
    Carlo Chiesa
    Ola Lindén
    Glenn Flux
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010, 37 : 1238 - 1250
  • [7] Application of voxel phantoms in whole-body counting for the validation of calibration phantoms and the assessment of uncertainties
    de Carlan, L.
    Roch, P.
    Blanchardon, E.
    Franck, D.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 125 (1-4) : 477 - 482
  • [8] Sensitivity of Whole-Body Dosimetry to Channel Model Parameters
    Jawad, Ourouk
    Lautru, David
    Benlarbi-Delai, Aziz
    De Doncker, Philippe
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2015, 63 (08) : 3654 - 3661
  • [9] USE OF A CLINICAL WHOLE-BODY COUNTER FOR RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL DOSIMETRY
    WELLMAN, HN
    KEREIAKE.J
    PETTUS, M
    SAENGER, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1967, 8 (04): : 306 - &
  • [10] Patient Specific Dosimetry Phantoms Using Multichannel LDDMM of the Whole Body
    Tward, Daniel J.
    Ceritoglu, Can
    Kolasny, Anthony
    Sturgeon, Gregory M.
    Segars, W. Paul
    Miller, Michael I.
    Ratnanather, J. Tilak
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 2011