Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:27
|
作者
Valiengo, Leandro [1 ,2 ]
Maia, Ana [3 ,4 ]
Cotovio, Goncalo [3 ,4 ]
Gordon, Pedro C. [2 ,5 ]
Brunoni, Andre R. [1 ,2 ]
Forlenza, Orestes, V [1 ]
Oliveira-Maia, Albino J. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Dept & Inst Psiquiatria,Lab Neurociencias LIM 27, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Serv Interdisciplinar Neuromodulacao SIN, Dept & Inst Psiquiatria, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP,Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Champalimaud Ctr Unknown, Champalimaud Res & Clin Ctr, Av Brasilia, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Ocidental, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurol & Stroke, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Univ Nova Lisboa, NMS, NOVA Med Sch, Lisbon, Portugal
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Brain stimulation; Depression; Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW; VASCULAR DEPRESSION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; META-REGRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; HF-RTMS; EFFICACY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1093/gerona/glab235
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) in older adults is a serious public health concern. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a nonpharmacological intervention approved for MDD treatment in adults, but its value in older adults remains unknown. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze evidence of rTMS efficacy in MDD treatment among older adults. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies assessing rTMS for the treatment of MDD in patients older than 50 years, published until June 2020. Random-effects meta-analyses using standardized mean differences (SMDs) were conducted to assess change in depression severity score (primary outcome), while odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess secondary categorical outcomes (response and remission). Additionally, univariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of change in depression severity scores. Results Fourteen RCTs were included in meta-analyses and 26 studies (10 RCTs and 16 open-label studies) in meta-regression. Active rTMS was significantly superior to sham treatment for reduction of severity (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.13-0.60), as well as response (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 2.11-5.04) and remission (OR = 4.63; 95% CI = 2.24-9.55). Studies were of moderate to high quality, with funnel plots and Egger's regression test not suggestive of publication bias. In meta-regressions, higher mean age and number of sessions were significantly associated with greater improvement. Conclusions Our results support that rTMS is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for MDD in older adults and that it should be considered in the treatment of this vulnerable population.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 860
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with antidepressants for major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Maneeton, B.
    Maneeton, N.
    Woottiluk, P.
    Oonarom, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : S65 - S66
  • [2] Transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology of patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kinjo, Megumi
    Wada, Masataka
    Nakajima, Shinichiro
    Tsugawa, Sakiko
    Nakahara, Tomomi
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Mimura, Masaru
    Noda, Yoshihiro
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [3] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Neurophysiology of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kinjo, Megumi
    Wada, Masataka
    Nakajima, Shinichiro
    Tsugawa, Sakiko
    Nakahara, Tomomi
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Mimura, Masaru
    Noda, Yoshihiro
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 45 (SUPPL 1) : 116 - 116
  • [4] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: A review
    Daskalakis, Z. Jeff
    Levinson, Andrea J.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2008, 53 (09): : 555 - 566
  • [5] Optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Rakesh, Gopalkumar
    Cordero, Patrick
    Khanal, Rebika
    Himelhoch, Seth S.
    Rush, Craig R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 358
  • [6] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Chaimani, Anna
    Moffa, Adriano H.
    Razza, Lais B.
    Gattaz, Wagner F.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    [J]. JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [7] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Knijnik, Leonardo M.
    Dussan-Sarria, Jairo A.
    Rozisky, Joanna R.
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Caumo, Wolnei
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (03) : 294 - 304
  • [8] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for mania: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2023, 25 (02) : 160 - 161
  • [9] Intermittent theta burst stimulation vs. high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2023, 328
  • [10] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bernardo Barahona-Correa, J.
    Velosa, Ana
    Chainho, Ana
    Lopes, Ricardo
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12