NIETZSCHE AND THE DIVINE IDIOCY OF JESUS

被引:0
|
作者
Bittencourt, Renato Nunes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Filosofia, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Nietzsche; Jesus; idiot; evangelical practice; beatitude;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-512X2011000100006
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The article turns on the axiologic distinction established by Nietzsche enters the gospelical practical of Jesus and the distortion of the same one for the institutionalization of the Christian morality. Through the indications of Nietzsche, one becomes fulfilled an interpretation immanent of the religious message of Jesus, who made of its doctrine a possibility of if reaching the beatitude in the scope of the proper life, and a promise does not stop beyond the world; more still, the evidence of that genuine practical Christian if based on an amoral valuation, destitute of any normative quality.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 119
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nietzsche and the divine
    Krummel, RF
    [J]. GERMANIC NOTES AND REVIEWS, 2001, 32 (02): : 196 - 197
  • [2] NIETZSCHE ON THE DIVINE
    ROTH, RA
    [J]. AUSLEGUNG-A JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1983, 10 (03): : 176 - 184
  • [3] Nietzsche's Jesus
    Cacciari, M
    [J]. ESPRIT, 2003, (10) : 134 - 144
  • [4] JESUS AS THE DIVINE WARRIOR
    STEVENS, BA
    [J]. EXPOSITORY TIMES, 1983, 94 (11): : 326 - 329
  • [5] Jesus the Divine Physician
    McTavish, Fr James
    [J]. LINACRE QUARTERLY, 2018, 85 (01): : 18 - 23
  • [6] The figure of Jesus in the writings of Nietzsche
    Paschoal, Antonio Edmilson
    [J]. REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA AURORA, 2016, 28 (44): : 633 - 652
  • [7] VERILY, NIETZSCHE JUDGMENT OF JESUS
    ROTH, RA
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY TODAY, 1990, 34 (04) : 364 - 376
  • [8] Jesus and Yahweh: the divine names
    Paulino da Silva, Clademilson Fernandes
    [J]. ESTUDOS DE RELIGIAO, 2007, 21 (32): : 216 - 225
  • [9] Jesus and Yahweh: The names divine
    Kermode, F
    [J]. NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2005, 52 (19) : 40 - 42
  • [10] Jesus and Yahweh - The names divine
    Rosen, J
    [J]. NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 2005, : 12 - 12