Decomposing Functional Model Inputs for Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Morris, Max D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Stat, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
关键词
computer experiments; Sobol' indices; uncertainty analysis; variance propagation;
D O I
10.1137/18M1173058
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Variance-based sensitivity analysis is a popular technique for assessing the importance of model inputs when there are natural or meaningful probability distributions associated with each input. This approach can be used when some of the model inputs are functions rather than scalar valued, but may be somewhat less useful in this case because it does not address the nature of the relationships between functional inputs and model outputs. We consider the option of separating a random function-valued input, represented by a vector of relatively high dimension, into one or a few scalar-valued summaries that are suggested by the context of the modeling exercise, and an independent, high-dimensional "residual." The first case we discuss is for inputs that are realizations of Gaussian processes, where the summary statistics are linear functionals of the input, and the residual can always be defined to be statistically independent of these. The second case is for input functions that might be described as "pulses" occurring in simulated time as a Poisson process, where the summary statistic is the number of such pulses and all other details form the residual. The third case involves periodic input functions for which the overall scale of the Fourier coefficients is controlled by the scalar-valued summary. We conclude by describing a graphical technique that may help to identify useful low-dimensional function summaries. When the model output is more sensitive to the low-dimensional summaries than to the residuals, this is useful information concerning the nature of model sensitivity, and also provides a route to constructing model surrogates with scalar-valued indices that accurately represent most of the variation in the output.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1599
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs
    Mara, Thierry A.
    Tarantola, Stefano
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 107 : 115 - 121
  • [2] Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a forest growth model
    Song, Xiaodong
    Bryan, Brett A.
    Paul, Keryn I.
    Zhao, Gang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 247 : 135 - 143
  • [3] Variance-based Sensitivity Indices for Stochastic Models with Correlated Inputs
    Kala, Zdenek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2014 (ICNAAM-2014), 2015, 1648
  • [4] Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis: An Illustration on the Lorenz'63 Model
    Marzban, Caren
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2013, 141 (11) : 4069 - 4079
  • [5] Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis of the Composite Dynamic Load Model
    Maldonado, Daniel Adrian
    Anitescu, Mihai
    [J]. 2020 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2020,
  • [6] Variance-based reliability sensitivity with dependent inputs using failure samples
    Ehre, Max
    Papaioannou, Iason
    Straub, Daniel
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2024, 106
  • [7] Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Chen, Xin
    Molina-Cristobal, Arturo
    Guenov, Marin D.
    Riaz, Atif
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 181 : 97 - 115
  • [8] Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model outputs using surrogate models
    Shahsavani, D.
    Grimvall, A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (06) : 723 - 730
  • [9] Variance-based sensitivity analysis for models with correlated inputs and its state dependent parameter solution
    Luyi Li
    Zhenzhou Lu
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56 : 919 - 937
  • [10] Variance-based sensitivity analysis for models with correlated inputs and its state dependent parameter solution
    Li, Luyi
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 56 (04) : 919 - 937