Numerical scaling of ratio scale utilities in multi-criteria decision analysis with geometric model

被引:2
|
作者
Leskinen, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Joensuu Res Unit, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
cardinal utility; measurement scale; scale dependency; statistical inference; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602364
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The ratio scale measurement of utilities in multi-criteria decision analysis has been criticised due to theoretical and practical interpretation of the required assessments. Compared to the ratio scale models, for example, the '0-1-scale' models based on interval scale have been more generally accepted. On the other hand, under some conditions it has been shown that the results of multi-criteria decision support based on ratio scale comparisons are actually independent of the numerical magnitude of the ratio scale assessments. This paper reviews and interprets these results and proposes new solutions for the remaining problems, for which the numerical magnitude of the ratio scale utilities is required. Moreover, we interpret the scale-independent ratio scale models with respect to some other multi-criteria decision support models. The theoretical analysis is carried out by statistical models and illustrated by numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Monat, Jamie P.
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 4 (06): : 492 - 508
  • [2] Using multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the vulnerability of drinking water utilities
    Joerin, Florent
    Cool, Genevieve
    Rodriguez, Manuel J.
    Gignac, Marc
    Bouchard, Christian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 166 (1-4) : 313 - 330
  • [3] Using multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the vulnerability of drinking water utilities
    Florent Joerin
    Geneviève Cool
    Manuel J. Rodriguez
    Marc Gignac
    Christian Bouchard
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 166 : 313 - 330
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement
    Zilinskas, A
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2001, 31 (02) : 151 - 152
  • [5] Rank reversals in multi-criteria decision analysis with statistical modelling of ratio-scale pairwise comparisons
    Leskinen, P
    Kangas, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (07) : 855 - 861
  • [6] RECENT FINDINGS FROM NUMERICAL ANALYSIS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Peldschus, Friedel
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (04) : 1695 - 1717
  • [7] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    [J]. CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829
  • [8] Presumption of model adequacy in fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Yatsalo, B.
    Korobov, A.
    Martinez, L.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPUTATION AND ROBOTICS, 2020, 12 : 759 - 766
  • [9] Geometric Bonferroni means with their application in multi-criteria decision making
    Xia, Meimei
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zhu, Bin
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 40 : 88 - 100
  • [10] Brain Drain: A Multi-criteria Decision Model
    Incekas, Ayse Basak
    Kadaifci, Cigdem
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 271 - 282