Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation

被引:52
|
作者
AlNouss, Ahmed [1 ]
McKay, Gordon [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Tareq [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Sustainable Dev, Doha, Qatar
[2] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Engn Management & Decis Sci, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Biomass gasification; Hydrogen; Enviro-economic; Feedstock blending; Pareto analysis; STEAM GASIFICATION; OXYGEN/STEAM GASIFICATION; SYNGAS PRODUCTION; CO-GASIFICATION; GAS-PRODUCTION; ENRICHED AIR; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114885
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Concerns related to global warming and the depletion of fossil fuels have propelled the global community to explore alternative renewable energy sources. Biomass is a nonconventional and renewable energy resource that can potentially be utilised for the production of sustainable heat and power. The thermal gasification process is an effective biomass conversion and utilisation method producing syngas as the product gas. This study details a biomass gasification process and subsequent optimisation, considering multiple parameters, including the type of feedstock and gasifying agent (gasifier) to maximise hydrogen production. Aspen Plus software is used to develop three agent-based biomass gasification models considering the characteristics of certain materials from Qatar built environment. The ultimate goal of the study is to optimise the gasification processes to yield different biomass blending options satisfying the maximisation of hydrogen generation through different scenarios. The capabilities of the built-in activated analysis package using Aspen Energy Analyser and Aspen Process Economic Analyser are utilised to evaluate the environmental and economic perspectives. The results demonstrate the excellence of steam-only biomass gasification in providing profitable and cleaner products. The yield of hydrogen production from blending of biomass feedstock achieved a high fraction of 5.23% with the steam-only gasification, while the yield increased from 1.63% to 5.22% for the oxygen/steam gasification when maximising the hydrogen fraction. Moreover, the selective limiting of biomass capacity enhances the quality of syngas through enriching the hydrogen production and lowers the need for subsequent adjustment and the manipulation of gasifying agent quantity and operating energy.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of steam and oxygen fed biomass gasification through a techno-economic-environmental study
    AlNouss, Ahmed
    McKay, Gordon
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 208
  • [2] Techno-economic-environmental assessment of green hydrogen production for selected countries in the Middle East
    Gado, Mohamed G.
    [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 92 : 984 - 999
  • [3] A combined approach-based techno-economic-environmental multi-optimization of a hydrogen generation system through waste biomass air-steam gasification
    Tavakoli, Navid
    Khoshkenar, Payam
    Pourfayaz, Fathollah
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 225
  • [4] Techno-economic Evaluation of an Ethanol Production Process for Biomass Waste
    Gwak, In-seop
    Hwang, Jong-Ha
    Lee, See Hoon
    [J]. APPLIED CHEMISTRY FOR ENGINEERING, 2016, 27 (02): : 171 - 178
  • [5] Coordinated scheduling of wind-solar-hydrogen-battery storage system for techno-economic-environmental optimization of hydrogen production
    Wang, Jingbo
    Wen, Jianfeng
    Wang, Jiarong
    Yang, Bo
    Jiang, Lin
    [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 314
  • [6] Carbon negative transportation fuels - A techno-economic-environmental analysis of biomass pathways for transportation
    Jasper, Micah
    Rafati, Navid
    Schimmel, Keith
    Shahbazi, Abolghasem
    Li, Fanxing
    Mba-Wright, Mark
    Wang, Lijun
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2022, 14
  • [7] Techno-economic-environmental evaluation of a combined cooling heating and power system for gas turbine waste heat recovery
    Wang, Shukun
    Zhang, Lu
    Liu, Chao
    Liu, Zuming
    Lan, Song
    Li, Qibin
    Wang, Xiaonan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 231
  • [8] Biomass feedstock production systems: Economic and environmental benefits
    Coleman, Mark D.
    Stanturf, John A.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (8-9): : 693 - 695
  • [9] Techno-Economic-Environmental Analysis of Sophorolipid Biosurfactant Production from Sugarcane Bagasse
    Elias, Andrew M.
    Longati, Andreza A.
    Ellamla, Harikishan R.
    Furlan, Felipe F.
    Ribeiro, Marcelo P. A.
    Marcelino, Paulo R. F.
    dos Santos, Julio C.
    da Silva, Silvio S.
    Giordano, Roberto C.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2021, 60 (27) : 9833 - 9850
  • [10] Biodiesel and Hydrogen Production in a Combined Palm and Jatropha Biomass Biorefinery: Simulation, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Evaluation
    Nino-Villalobos, Antonio
    Puello-Yarce, Jaime
    Dario Gonzalez-Delgado, Angel
    Ojeda, K. A.
    Sanchez-Tuiran, Eduardo
    [J]. ACS OMEGA, 2020, 5 (13): : 7074 - 7084