Robotic Spine Surgery: Current State in Minimally Invasive Surgery

被引:45
|
作者
Vo, Chau D. [1 ]
Jiang, Bowen [1 ]
Azad, Tej D. [2 ]
Crawford, Neil R. [3 ]
Bydon, Ali [1 ]
Theodore, Nicholas [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
robotics; spine surgery; Mazor; ExcelsiusGPS; ROSA; pedicle screw; minimally invasive surgery; navigation; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; THORACIC SPINE; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; GUIDANCE; TUMOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/2192568219878131
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: Robotic systems in spinal surgery may offer potential benefits for both patients and surgeons. In this article, the authors explore the future prospects and current limitations of robotic systems in minimally invasive spine surgery. Methods: We describe recent developments in robotic spine surgery and minimally invasive spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed. Results: Although robotic application in spine surgery has been gradual, the past decade has seen the arrival of several novel robotic systems for spinal procedures, suggesting the evolution of technology capable of augmenting surgical ability. Conclusion: Spine surgery is well positioned to benefit from robotic assistance and automation. Paired with enhanced navigation technologies, robotic systems have tremendous potential to supplement the skills of spine surgeons, improving patient safety and outcomes while limiting complications and costs.
引用
收藏
页码:34S / 40S
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Current State of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Kim, Choll W.
    Siemionow, Krzysztof
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Phillips, Frank M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (06): : 582 - 596
  • [2] The State of the Art in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Kim, Ki-Tack
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Yeung, Anthony T.
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [3] Minimally-Invasive Assisted Robotic Spine Surgery (MARSS)
    de la Torre, Ramiro Perez A.
    Ramanathan, Siddharth
    Williams, Ashley L.
    Perez-Cruet, Mick J.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [4] Current Advances and Evidence in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Slimack, Nicholas
    Smith, Justin S.
    Parkinson, Richard J.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2012, 2012
  • [5] The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
    Huang, Meng
    Tetreault, Tyler A.
    Vaishnav, Avani
    York, Philip J.
    Staub, Blake N.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [6] Minimally invasive spine surgery
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2008, 25 (02)
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Saumyajit Basu
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2018, 52 (5) : 572 - 572
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Darren R. Lebl
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2017, 10 (3) : 407 - 408
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Tanner, P.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 53 (03) : 93 - 94
  • [10] Minimally invasive spine surgery
    Fessler, RG
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) : SIII - SIV