Blastocyst morphology is associated with the incidence of monozygotic twinning in assisted reproductive technology

被引:15
|
作者
Shi, Wenhao [1 ]
Jin, Lei [2 ]
Liu, Jiayin [3 ]
Zhang, Cuilian [4 ]
Mi, Yang [1 ]
Shi, Juanzi [1 ]
Wang, Hui [1 ]
Liang, Xiaoyan [5 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Womens & Childrens Hosp, Assisted Reprod Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Reprod Med Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Reprod Med Ctr, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Reprod Med Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 6, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blastocyst morphology; inner cell mass; monochorionic; monozygotic twinning; trophectoderm; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; RISK-FACTORS; PREGNANCIES; STAGE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.101
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An increased incidence of monozygotic twinning after a blastocyst transfer has been previously reported in assisted reproductive technology treatment. It is uncertain whether this phenomenon is due to the extended culture time, culture medium, or inherent blastocyst parameters. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between blastocyst parameters (in vitro culture time, blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading) and the incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study employing data from a multicenter, large, electronic database from 4 academic hospitals. All clinical pregnancies after a single blastocyst transfer between January 2014 and February 2020 were included. Blastocyst morphology was evaluated based on the Gardner grading system, considering the blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading (grades A, B, and C). Monozygotic twinning was defined as >2 fetal heartbeats in a single gestational sac or 2 gestational sacs with sex concordance at birth. The multivariable predicted marginal proportions from logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted relative risks for the association between blastocyst parameters and the incidence of monozygotic twinning. RESULTS: The overall monozygotic twinning rate was 1.53% (402 of 26,254 cases). The monozygotic twinning was not associated with the culture time in vitro (day 5 vs day 6) or blastocyst stage (early, blastocyst, expanded, hatching, and hatched). Alternatively, monozygotic twinning was associated with lower inner cell mass grading (B vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.67 [95 % confidence interval, 1.28-2.25]; C vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.98 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.11]) and higher trophectoderm grading (B vs C: adjusted relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.92]; A vs C: adjusted relative risk, 2.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.45-3.20]). The incidence of monozygotic twinning was the lowest in blastocysts with grade A inner cell mass and grade B or C trophectoderm (0.82%, as the reference) and the highest in blastocysts with grade B or C inner cell mass and grade A trophectoderm (2.40%; adjusted relative risk, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-4.43). The incidence of monozygotic twinning in blastocysts with consistent inner cell mass or trophectoderm grading was somewhere in between (both A: 1.58%; adjusted relative risk, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.04]; both B or C: 1.59%; adjusted relative risk, 1.84 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.90]). CONCLUSION: Higher risk of monozygotic twinning was associated with blastocyst morphology specific to those blastocysts with loosely arranged inner cell mass cells combined with tightly packed trophectoderm cells.
引用
收藏
页码:654.e1 / 654.e16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blastocyst transfer is associated with an increased incidence of monozygotic twinning
    Behr, B
    Fisch, JD
    Milki, AA
    Racowski, C
    Miller, K
    Pool, TB
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 181 - 181
  • [2] Incidence of monozygotic twins in blastocyst and cleavage stage assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Sharara, Fady I.
    Abdo, Galal
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 642 - 645
  • [3] Effect of blastocyst morphology on the incidence of monozygotic twinning pregnancy after single blastocyst transfer
    Ge, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Jiaxin
    Shi, Hao
    Bu, Zhiqin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [4] Is there increased monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology?
    Toledo, MG
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (05): : 360 - 364
  • [5] Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
    Chen, Na
    Li, Jingyu
    Li, Yexing
    Zhang, Yiyuan
    Li, Jiarong
    Gao, Jie
    Hu, Jingmei
    Cui, Linlin
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2023, 2023 (04)
  • [6] Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review
    Aston, K. I.
    Peterson, C. M.
    Carrell, D. T.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION, 2008, 136 (04) : 377 - 386
  • [7] Trends and Correlates of Monozygotic Twinning After Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Kanter, Jessica R.
    Boulet, Sheree
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Kissin, Dmitry
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 6S - 6S
  • [8] Blastocyst culture is associated with an elevated incidence of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer
    Kawachiya, Satoshi
    Bodri, Daniel
    Shimada, Naoko
    Kato, Keiichi
    Takehara, Yuji
    Kato, Osamu
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (06) : 2140 - 2142
  • [9] Blastocyst transfer and monozygotic twinning
    Peramo, B
    Ricciarelli, E
    Cuadros-Fernández, JM
    Huguet, E
    Hernández, ER
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (06) : 1116 - 1117
  • [10] The incidence of monozygotic twinning in assisted reproductive technology: Analysis based on results from the 2010 Japanese ART national registry
    Takashi Nakasuji
    Hidekazu Saito
    Ryuichiro Araki
    Aritoshi Nakaza
    Akira Nakashima
    Akira Kuwahara
    Osamu Ishihara
    Minoru Irahara
    Toshiro Kubota
    Yasunori Yoshimura
    Tetsuro Sakumoto
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2014, 31 : 803 - 807