The Structure of Subjective Well-Being and Its Relation to Objective Well-Being Indicators: Evidence from EU-SILC for Serbia

被引:22
|
作者
Vladisavljevic, Marko [1 ]
Mentus, Vladimir [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Econ Sci, Zmaj Jovina 12, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Inst Social Sci, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Subjective well-being; Serbia; EU-SILC; OECD Better Life Initiative; LIFE SATISFACTION; HAPPINESS; QUALITY; WORK; DISCRIMINANT; CONSTRUCT; VALIDITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0033294118756335
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine the structure of the subjective well-being and its relation to objective well-being indicators using the data from the European Union's Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) from Serbia. This is one of the first papers to analyze a new module on subjective well-being from EU-SILC micro-dataset (with over 20,000 respondents). We investigate the factor structure of the items and the differences in the association of subjective well-being dimensions with objective indicators of well-being within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Better Life Initiative framework. Three factors emerge from the principal components analysis: general life satisfaction, affective well-being, and satisfaction with the local environment. The analysis further reveals that life satisfaction is more related to the material living conditions, such as income, unemployment, and housing conditions, while affective well-being is more related to non-material indicators of well-being such as perceived health, personal security, and social connections. On the other hand, positive and negative affect within the affective well-being are not clearly separable, nor is the eudaimonic indicator from either life satisfaction or affective well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 60
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Growth Following Adversity and Its Relation with Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Well-Being
    Durkin, John
    Joseph, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS & TRAUMA, 2009, 14 (03): : 228 - 234
  • [2] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [3] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [4] Well-being: subjective and objective aspects
    Alatartseva, Elena
    Barysheva, Galina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH PARADIGMS TRANSFORMATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCES 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 2015, 166 : 36 - 42
  • [5] ON THE STRUCTURE OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    CHAMBERLAIN, K
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1988, 20 (06) : 581 - 604
  • [6] Subjective Well-Being and Income Below the 'At-Risk-of-Poverty Threshold': Analysis of Slovak EU-SILC Data
    Dzuka, Jozef
    Lacny, Martin
    Babincak, Peter
    [J]. STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2019, 61 (04) : 213 - 229
  • [7] Objective Environmental Indicators and Subjective Well-Being: Are They Directly Related?
    Betti, Gianni
    Neri, Laura
    Lonzi, Marco
    Lemmi, Achille
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [8] Trust and subjective well-being: The case of Serbia
    Jovanovic, Veljko
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 98 : 284 - 288
  • [9] Macroeconomic Indicators and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from the European Union
    Marton, Boris
    Mojsejova, Alena
    [J]. STATISTIKA-STATISTICS AND ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 102 (04) : 369 - 381
  • [10] Different Types of Religious/Spiritual Well-Being in Relation to Personality and Subjective Well-Being
    Unterrainer, Human-Friedrich
    Ladenhauf, Karl Heinz
    Wallner-Liebmann, Sandra Johanna
    Fink, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION, 2011, 21 (02) : 115 - 126