Modifications in Aortic Stiffness After Endovascular or Open Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Bissacco, Daniele [1 ]
Conti, Michele [2 ]
Domanin, Maurizio [1 ,3 ]
Bianchi, Daniele [2 ]
Scudeller, Luigia [4 ]
Mandigers, Tim J. [1 ]
Allievi, Sara [1 ]
Auricchio, Ferdinando [2 ]
Trimarchi, Santi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Vasc Surg Dept, Via Francesco Sforza 35, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Civil Engn & Architecture Dept, Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Clin & Community Sci Dept, Milan, Italy
[4] IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Milan, Italy
关键词
Aortic stiffness; Arterial stiffness; Endovascular aneurism repair; EVAR; Meta-analysis; TEVAR; PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ANEURYSM REPAIR; MECHANISMS; PREDICTION; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.01.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Increased aortic stiffness (AoS) has been recognised as a risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of aortic repair on AoS. Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for relevant studies evaluating the consequences of endovascular and open aortic repair on AoS. Review Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement was followed to perform the research process. Papers containing data on AoS before and after both thoracic (TEVAR) and abdominal (EVAR) endovascular repair, as well as open surgical repair (OSR), were included for detailed evaluation. A fixed effects model was used to perform analysis. The NewcastleeOttawa Scale was calculated for each included study. Results: The first article cluster comprised 367 papers. After removal of duplicates and the adoption of inclusion/ exclusion criteria, 14 articles remained, 13 of which were selected for meta-analysis. Ten studies analysed EVAR and three analysed TEVAR. Five of the selected papers were case control studies, with OSR adopted in four of these as the EVAR comparator. Several graft types were used in the endovascular group. AoS increased after TEVAR and EVAR, in terms of pulse wave velocity (PWV), even though several spatial levels and measurement modalities were adopted. No differences were described after OSR, although no pooled data could be analysed. Conclusion: EVAR and TEVAR both demonstrated a significant increase in AoS measurement (PWV). Although the heterogeneity and the low number of available studies limit the strength of the results, this review highlights the potential deleterious endograft role in the cardiovascular system although further studies are needed to achieve robust evidence. Further studies are needed to improve the mutual interaction between aorta and endograft, minimising their impact on the native aortic wall properties.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 577
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open Surgical Conversion After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alqahtani, Saeed S.
    Aljaber, Fahad K.
    Alsuwailem, Bader Y.
    Almashouq, Yazeed A.
    Alharbi, Bander G.
    Masoud, Riyadh H.
    Albaqami, Faisal A.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [2] Reintervention after endovascular repair for aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhao, Zhiqing
    Chen, Yanqing
    Sun, Yudong
    Bao, Junmin
    Jing, Zaiping
    Zhou, Jian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 152 (05): : 1279 - +
  • [3] Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yanqing
    Zhang, Simeng
    Liu, Lei
    Lu, Qingsheng
    Zhang, Tianyi
    Jing, Zaiping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (09):
  • [4] Open surgical repair, hybrid and endovascular repair of aortic arch pathology: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elhelali, A.
    Morris, L.
    Hynes, N.
    Kavanagh, E. P.
    Sultan, S.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S88 - S88
  • [5] Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Young
    Kontopodis, Nikolaos
    Gavalaki, Aikaterini
    Galanakis, Nikolaos
    Kantzas, Michalis
    Ioannou, Christos
    Geroulakos, George
    Kakisis, John
    Antoniou, George A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023,
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis of migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Spanos, Konstantinos
    Karathanos, Christos
    Saleptsis, Vasileios
    Giannoukas, Athanasios D.
    [J]. VASCULAR, 2016, 24 (03) : 323 - 336
  • [7] A systematic review and meta-analysis of early outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms
    Rocha, Rodolfo V.
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    Elbatarny, Malak
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Al-Omran, Mohammed
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Lindsay, Thomas F.
    Ouzounian, Maral
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (06) : 1936 - +
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of proximal aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Chatzelas, Dimitrios A.
    Loutradis, Charalampos N.
    Pitoulias, Apostolos G.
    Kalogirou, Thomas E.
    Pitoulias, Georgios A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (03) : 941 - 956.e1
  • [9] Endovascular vs open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadat, Umar
    Boyle, Jonathan R.
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    Tang, Tjun
    Varty, Kevin
    Hayes, Paul D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (01) : 227 - 236
  • [10] Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Cheng, Davy
    Martin, Janet
    Shennib, Hani
    Dunning, Joel
    Muneretto, Claudio
    Schueler, Stephan
    Von Segesser, Ludwig
    Sergeant, Paul
    Turina, Marko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10) : 986 - 1001