Priming with MF59 adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines in children - A systematic review and a meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Patel, Manish M. [1 ]
Davis, William [1 ]
Beacham, Lauren [1 ]
Spencer, Sarah [1 ]
Campbell, Angela P. [1 ]
Lafond, Kathryn [1 ]
Rolfes, Melissa [1 ]
Levine, Min Z. [1 ]
Azziz-Baumgartner, Eduardo [1 ]
Thompson, Mark G. [1 ]
Fry, Alicia M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Influenza Div, Natl Ctr Immunizat & Resp Dis, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
关键词
Influenza; Inactivated influenza vaccine; Adjuvants; Children; Immunogenicity; YOUNG-CHILDREN; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; PHASE-III; IMMUNOGENICITY; TRIVALENT; LIVE; SAFETY; INFANTS; BURDEN; VIRUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.053
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Identifying optimal priming strategies for children <2 years could substantially improve the public health benefits of influenza vaccines. Adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines were designed to promote a better immune response among young vaccine-naive children. Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized trials to assess hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody response to MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) versus nonadjuvanted IIV among children. We estimated pooled ratios of post-vaccination HAI geometric mean titer (GMT) for aIIV versus IIV and confidence intervals (CIs) using the pooled variances derived from reported CIs. Results: Mean age was 28 months (range, 6-72 months). Children received vaccines with either 7.5 mu g (6-35 months) or 15 mu g (>36 months) hemagglutinin of each strain depending on age. Seven of eight trials administered trivalent vaccines and one used quadrivalent vaccine. Pooled post-vaccination GMT ratios against the three influenza vaccine strains were 2.5-3.5 fold higher after 2-dose-aIIV versus 2-dose-IIV among children 6-72 months, and point estimates were higher among children 6-35 months compared with older children. When comparing 1-dose-aIIV to 2-dose-IIV doses, pooled GMT ratios were not significantly different against A/H1N1 (1.0; 95% CI: 0.5-1.8; p = 0.90) and A/H3N2 viruses (1.0; 95% CI: 0.7-1.5; p = 0.81) and were significantly lower against B viruses (0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.8; p < 0.001) for both age groups. Notably, GMT ratios for vaccine-mismatched heterologous viruses after 2-dose-aIIV compared with 2-dose-IIV were higher against A/H1N1 (2.0; 95% CI: 1.1-3.4), A/H3N2 (2.9; 95% CI: 1.9-4.2), and B-lineage viruses (2.1; 95% CI: 1.8-2.6). Conclusions: Two doses of adjuvanted IIV consistently induced better humoral immune responses against Type A and B influenza viruses compared with nonadjuvanted IIVs in young children, particularly among those 6-35 months. One adjuvanted IIV dose had a similar response to two nonadjuvanted IIV doses against Type A influenza viruses. Longer-term benefits from imprinting and cell-mediated immunity, including trials of clinical efficacy, are gaps that warrant investigation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 619
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MF59® Adjuvanted Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza Vaccines
    Tsai, Theodore F.
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2011, 131 (12): : 1733 - 1741
  • [2] MF59®-adjuvanted vaccines for seasonal and pandemic influenza prophylaxis
    Banzhoff, Angelika
    Pellegrini, Michele
    Del Giudice, Giuseppe
    Fragapane, Elena
    Groth, Nicola
    Podda, Audino
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2008, 2 (06) : 243 - 249
  • [3] MF59™-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in young children
    Puig-Barbera, Joan
    Perez-Vilar, Silvia
    Diez-Domingo, Javier
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2011, 10 (11) : 1519 - 1528
  • [4] Systems biology of immunity to MF59-adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines in early childhood
    Nakaya, Helder I.
    Clutterbuck, Elizabeth
    Kazmin, Dmitri
    Wang, Lili
    Cortese, Mario
    Bosinger, Steven E.
    Patel, Nirav B.
    Zak, Daniel E.
    Aderemg, Alan
    Dong, Tao
    Del Giudice, Giuseppe
    Rappuoli, Rino
    Cerundolo, Vincenzo
    Pollard, Andrew J.
    Pulendran, Bali
    Siegrist, Claire-Anne
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (07) : 1853 - 1858
  • [5] Effectiveness of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Domnich, Alexander
    Arata, Lucia
    Amicizia, Daniela
    Puig-Barbera, Joan
    Gasparini, Roberto
    Panatto, Donatella
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (04) : 513 - 520
  • [6] Influenza vaccination in children primed with MF59®-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine
    Vesikari, Timo
    Forsten, Aino
    Arora, Ashwani
    Tsai, Theodore
    Clemens, Ralf
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (08) : 2102 - 2112
  • [7] Relative Effectiveness of MF59 Adjuvanted Trivalent Influenza Vaccine vs Nonadjuvanted Vaccines During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season
    Imran, Mahrukh
    Puig-Barbera, Joan
    Ortiz, Justin R.
    Fischer, Lauren
    O'Brien, Dan
    Bonafede, Machaon
    Mansi, James A.
    Boikos, Constantina
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 9 (05):
  • [8] Dissecting the Immune Response to MF59-adjuvanted and Nonadjuvanted Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Children Less Than Three Years of Age
    Zedda, Luisanna
    Forleo-Neto, Eduardo
    Vertruyen, Andre
    Raes, Marc
    Marchant, Arnaud
    Jansen, Wim
    Clouting, Heather
    Arora, Ashwani
    Beatty, Mark E.
    Galli, Grazia
    Del Giudice, Giuseppe
    Castellino, Flora
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2015, 34 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [9] Enhanced Immunogenicity of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Young Children Using MF59 Adjuvant
    Vesikari, Timo
    Pellegrini, Michele
    Karvonen, Aino
    Groth, Nicola
    Borkowski, Astrid
    O'Hagan, Derek T.
    Podda, Audino
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2009, 28 (07) : 563 - 571
  • [10] Effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of influenza vaccines with MF59 adjuvant in healthy people of different age groups: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Jing
    Zhang, Jiayou
    Han, Tian
    Liu, Chen
    Li, Xinghang
    Yan, Luyao
    Yang, Baifeng
    Yang, Xiaoming
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)