Hydrodynamic modelling of a flood-prone tidal river using the 1D model MIKE HYDRO River: calibration and sensitivity analysis

被引:29
|
作者
Jahandideh-Tehrani, Mahsa [1 ]
Helfer, Fernanda [1 ]
Zhang, Hong [1 ]
Jenkins, Graham [1 ]
Yu, Yingying [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
River model; MIKE HYDRO; Manning's roughness coefficient; Random noise; Boundary condition; NEURAL-NETWORK; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; WATER-QUALITY; INUNDATION; SIMULATION; UNCERTAINTY; RUNOFF; SWAT;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-019-8049-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrodynamic modelling is a powerful tool to gain understanding of river conditions. However, as widely known, models vary in terms of how they respond to changes and uncertainty in their input parameters. A hydrodynamic river model (MIKE HYDRO River) was developed and calibrated for a flood-prone tidal river located in South East Queensland, Australia. The model was calibrated using Manning's roughness coefficient for the normal dry and flood periods. The model performance was assessed by comparing observed and simulated water level, and estimating performance indices. Results indicated a satisfactory agreement between the observed and simulated results. The hydrodynamic modelling results revealed that the calibrated Manning's roughness coefficient ranged between 0.011 and 0.013. The impacts of tidal variation at the river mouth and the river discharge from upstream are the major driving force for the hydrodynamic process. To investigate the impacts of the boundary conditions, a new sensitivity analysis approach, based on adding stochastic terms (random noise) to the time series of boundary conditions, was conducted. The main purpose of such new sensitivity analysis was to impose changes in magnitude and time of boundary conditions randomly, which is more similar to the real and natural water level variations compared to impose constant changes of water level. In this new approach, the possible number of variations in simulated results was separately evaluated for both downstream and upstream boundaries under 5%, 10%, and 15% perturbation. The sensitivity analysis results revealed that in the river under study, the middle parts of the river were shown to be more sensitive to downstream boundary condition as maximum water level variations can reach 8%, 12%, and 15% under 5%, 10%, and 15% changes in the downstream boundary, respectively. The outcomes of the present paper will benefit future modelling efforts through provision of a robust tool to enable prediction of water levels at ungauged points of the river under various scenarios of flooding and climate change for the purpose of city planning and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrodynamic modelling of a flood-prone tidal river using the 1D model MIKE HYDRO River: calibration and sensitivity analysis
    Mahsa Jahandideh-Tehrani
    Fernanda Helfer
    Hong Zhang
    Graham Jenkins
    Yingying Yu
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, 192
  • [2] Hydrodynamic modelling of a large flood-prone river system in India with limited data
    Patro, Shivananda
    Chatterjee, Chandranath
    Singh, Rajendra
    Raghuwanshi, Narendra Singh
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (19) : 2774 - 2791
  • [3] Improvement in 1D hydrodynamic modeling using MIKE Hydro
    Vashist, Komal
    Singh, K. K.
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (04) : 5653 - 5663
  • [4] Improvement in 1D hydrodynamic modeling using MIKE Hydro
    Komal Vashist
    K. K. Singh
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, 8 : 5653 - 5663
  • [5] Flood modeling in the Ba River basin using a coupled hydrodynamic model—MIKE FLOOD
    Tuan L.A.
    Van C.T.
    Binh D.V.
    Kantoush S.A.
    Sumi T.
    Quyen L.V.
    Huong T.T.
    [J]. River, 2024, 3 (02): : 199 - 207
  • [6] Flood routing simulation in tidal river by 2D hydrodynamic model
    Ma, Jinrong
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Xingnan
    [J]. ASIAN AND PACIFIC COASTS 2007, 2007, : 375 - +
  • [7] Modelling flood-prone area and vulnerability using integration of multi-criteria analysis and HAND model in the Ogun River Basin, Nigeria
    Komolafe, A. A.
    Awe, B. S.
    Olorunfemi, I. E.
    Oguntunde, P. G.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2020, 65 (10): : 1766 - 1783
  • [8] Hydrological modelling of largest braided river of India using MIKE Hydro River software with rainfall runoff, hydrodynamic and snowmelt modules
    Pareta, Kuldeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (04) : 1314 - 1338
  • [9] Uncertainty Analysis of a 1D River Hydraulic Model with Adaptive Calibration
    Bessar, Mohammed Amine
    Matte, Pascal
    Anctil, Francois
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [10] Towards a reasoned 1D river model calibration
    Vidal, JP
    Moisan, S
    Faure, JB
    Dartus, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2005, 7 (02) : 91 - 104